View Single Post
Old 03-04-2010, 04:25 PM   #27
Dkavtbek

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
465
Senior Member
Default
The way you phrase this makes it sound like this was not something you liked, or possibly even agreed with.
No, realization of the inevitable. One such zero-tolerance policy is workplace violence. I defended someone in a case where no contact was made, but the threat was enough. I tried to minimize the damage, but I knew it was a lost cause. Of course I didn't like it, but I didn't disagree with it.

I think the fact that, even if this was a no tolerance policy, that the FAA seems to be out to gut this guy instead of admitting reluctance for enforcement on a relatively innocuous event is what gets me irked. Speculation on your part. If in fact, the policy is zero-tolerance, then the event isn't innocuous.

Instead they sound like this guy had the plane full of Nuns, orphans and puppies on the line between life and death and he let this kid risk them all.... You are stuck in reactive rules, which are no rules at all.
Dkavtbek is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:36 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity