View Single Post
Old 01-22-2010, 05:12 PM   #5
mazabotman

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
487
Senior Member
Default
^^ I wholeheartedly disagree.

While it may seem like a technicality, all this shows is the poor lawyering on the part of the prosecution not the decay of civilization itself. Besides there has been a long history of courts splitting hairs on grammar, this is surely not the first instance.
It is a technicality. Regardless of the degree of "Lawyering" performed by the presecution, the whole idea of being held up on technicalities that can be counterargued is a waste of time and money.

If they were smart they would just let her go and catch them again later. It is not as if they will suddenly change professions or anything.

The problem is, $$ wasted in their capture. The charges should be allowed to be reworded to match the actual crime and we should not get hung up on somantics.
mazabotman is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:39 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity