DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**adverwork** · 08-29-2009, 12:28 AM

No, you specifically said that I thought that Macaskill was a British minister. You had read my post incorrectly. You then asked me to explain the discrepancy.

You then launch an assault of pms at me on this very point. Again unecessary and incorrect.

Slow down, settle down, and perhaps before you start debating this point, study constitutional law and politics for 6 years, and learn to accept that sometimes, you can be wrong.

OR keep digging an intellectual hole for yourself.

In short, enough of the HU HA please. And the lashing out in an attempt to correct me. It spells FAIL.

The Drudge Report linked story was breaking news when I posted it and relevant, and now everywhere in the mainstream press.

08-29-2009, 12:28 AM	#47
adverwork Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 488 Senior Member	No, you specifically said that I thought that Macaskill was a British minister. You had read my post incorrectly. You then asked me to explain the discrepancy. You then launch an assault of pms at me on this very point. Again unecessary and incorrect. Slow down, settle down, and perhaps before you start debating this point, study constitutional law and politics for 6 years, and learn to accept that sometimes, you can be wrong. OR keep digging an intellectual hole for yourself. In short, enough of the HU HA please. And the lashing out in an attempt to correct me. It spells FAIL. The Drudge Report linked story was breaking news when I posted it and relevant, and now everywhere in the mainstream press.
	Quote