DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - Egyptian woman killed in German court for being veiled

**Fouttysotlalf** · 07-07-2009, 07:14 PM

Post 10 is perfectly fine. I clearly explained myself. I think the post is entirely civil. What is condescending about it?

Also: I made no arguments with anyone. I even agreed with 212's sentiments that the German leaders should have responded more strongly.(note I say, "I do not disagree with the "immediately preceding thought".)

I have no idea what on earth you are "calling me out on".

This whole thing is baffling.

If anyone here (and that includes other Moderators) can find anything wrong with the following post please explain because i can't. Here it is (it would help to read it in it's context) but in the meantime, here is post 10:

There is the post.

And then there is "the immediatly preceding thought".

"the immediatly preceding thought" was:

"German leaders made a huge mistake by not speaking out strongly about this, right away."

My response to that was:

"Will some one please post statements from Muslim leaders condeming the murder of film director Theo van Gogh... shot 8 times, nearly decapitated, and left with two knives implanted in him?"

---------

BTW: I do not disagree with the "immediately preceding thought".

-----

LOL. I am being called juvenile for saying "no you" ...from a guy throwing around the pure Beaver-to-Wally "Cut it out!"

--

07-07-2009, 07:14 PM	#6
Fouttysotlalf Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 549 Senior Member	Post 10 is perfectly fine. I clearly explained myself. I think the post is entirely civil. What is condescending about it? Also: I made no arguments with anyone. I even agreed with 212's sentiments that the German leaders should have responded more strongly.(note I say, "I do not disagree with the "immediately preceding thought".) I have no idea what on earth you are "calling me out on". This whole thing is baffling. If anyone here (and that includes other Moderators) can find anything wrong with the following post please explain because i can't. Here it is (it would help to read it in it's context) but in the meantime, here is post 10: There is the post. And then there is "the immediatly preceding thought". "the immediatly preceding thought" was: "German leaders made a huge mistake by not speaking out strongly about this, right away." My response to that was: "Will some one please post statements from Muslim leaders condeming the murder of film director Theo van Gogh... shot 8 times, nearly decapitated, and left with two knives implanted in him?" --------- BTW: I do not disagree with the "immediately preceding thought". ----- LOL. I am being called juvenile for saying "no you" ...from a guy throwing around the pure Beaver-to-Wally "Cut it out!" --
	Quote