DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**jq0AFTTC** · 07-02-2009, 03:56 PM

So this law says holding up the careers of more than a few individuals on the suspicion of bias when there is no other proof is a fair and equitable law?

I am serious whan I say forgive my ignorance, but what exactly does this law say, and how does it make it right to punish the people today for things they, and even their ancestors were not guilty of yesterday?

Again, what was in these tests that could even remotely be considered discrimnatory and therefore subject to dismissal in court/by law?

07-02-2009, 03:56 PM	#8
jq0AFTTC Join Date Dec 2005 Posts 380 Senior Member	So this law says holding up the careers of more than a few individuals on the suspicion of bias when there is no other proof is a fair and equitable law? I am serious whan I say forgive my ignorance, but what exactly does this law say, and how does it make it right to punish the people today for things they, and even their ancestors were not guilty of yesterday? Again, what was in these tests that could even remotely be considered discrimnatory and therefore subject to dismissal in court/by law?
	Quote