DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**auctionlover** · 11-09-2005, 04:27 PM

All they are teaching is that doubt exists with the Theory of Evolution. This is true, there is doubt about it's validity, it has not been proven. Even Darwin admitted it. That is why he called it a THEORY.

Oh you do not know.

They are trying to state it as if the theory is nothing but an idea, and that other ideas such as creative design are ranked as equal to it merely because they both are not 100% proven.

The thing is, there is no way to DISPROVE a theory when you put a rule on it like "this is how it happened, but you can't see it until you are dead".

That just does not stack up with science.

BTW, you know Relativity is just a theory too, and Gravity. AAMOF, 99% of all science is just theory. That is the one thing that makes science different than religion.

People in science will, albeit begrudgingly, admit to their own favored theory not being the best fit. In religion, it is heresy to question the rule of God.

The thing that annoys me about this is not that these guys are saying that it should be taught as a theory, that may not be 100% on the mark, but introducing these other "theories" that are not based on anything that can, or has been proven.

Just because you cannot say with absolute certainty with fossilized and DNA evidence. Hell, eyewitness accounts why dont you, that we all came from the same basic starting point does not mean that pigs can fly.

11-09-2005, 04:27 PM	#3
auctionlover Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 377 Senior Member	All they are teaching is that doubt exists with the Theory of Evolution. This is true, there is doubt about it's validity, it has not been proven. Even Darwin admitted it. That is why he called it a THEORY. Oh you do not know. They are trying to state it as if the theory is nothing but an idea, and that other ideas such as creative design are ranked as equal to it merely because they both are not 100% proven. The thing is, there is no way to DISPROVE a theory when you put a rule on it like "this is how it happened, but you can't see it until you are dead". That just does not stack up with science. BTW, you know Relativity is just a theory too, and Gravity. AAMOF, 99% of all science is just theory. That is the one thing that makes science different than religion. People in science will, albeit begrudgingly, admit to their own favored theory not being the best fit. In religion, it is heresy to question the rule of God. The thing that annoys me about this is not that these guys are saying that it should be taught as a theory, that may not be 100% on the mark, but introducing these other "theories" that are not based on anything that can, or has been proven. Just because you cannot say with absolute certainty with fossilized and DNA evidence. Hell, eyewitness accounts why dont you, that we all came from the same basic starting point does not mean that pigs can fly.
	Quote