View Single Post
Old 07-13-2008, 12:53 AM   #4
JTS_tv

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
572
Senior Member
Default
The only violation here is Rangel's supposed use of a Rent Stabilized unit in which he does not reside for business purposes -- the law requires that such an apartment be used for the "Primary Residence" of the tenant. The legal cure is eviction from the RS unit. So Rangel will clearly need to look for another place to do business.

Case law allows the combining of RS units. Rangel occupies as his residence ONE RS unit (which was formerly 3 separate units, since combined into 1 contiguous unit). By all appearances everything about his residential tenancy -- including the amount of rent due & paid --complies with the law.

The headline regarding "Four Rent-Stabilized Apartments" is misleading.
JTS_tv is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:04 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity