DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - Neal Boortz supports the socialist friendly Fair Tax?

**GtmFeqJJ** · 05-13-2006, 06:05 PM

I am curious if anyone here knows if Sean Hannity actually supports H.R. 25, or if he is undecided and merely leaning in favor of H.R. 25. I understand he is scheduling a public event the 24th of this month with Neal Boortz who promotes H.R. 25.

I am also curious to know if anyone here knows if Sean Hannity has ever compaired H.R. 25 to our nations original tax plan which contains a number of self regulating checks and balances which were intentionally designed to create a fair tax system and also designed to control the fiscal conduct of Congress.

For example, the founder’s plan provides a method to extinguish deficits in a timely manner and by a fixed rule of apportionment which today‘s socialists in Congress and friends of big government dread. H. R. 25 by contrast is designed to support existing big government and socialist programs which are financed by borrowing and deficit spending, without a fixed rule to extinguish deficits.

Our founding fathers’ original tax plan was also designed to allow Congress to tax consumption, but in a manner in which the limit of tax on each particular article taxed would be determined by the market place, and was intended to not tax the necessities of life nor tools of production and supplies necessary in conducting trade.

The founder’s intended each specific article of consumption to be intentionally selected for taxation, and then an appropriate amount of tax levied upon each specific article chosen. By contrast, H.R. 25 is an across the board percentage tax on the sale of property which interferes with the market place determining the limit of taxation on each specific article chosen for taxation.

H. R. 25 also defies the founder’s intention to limit taxes on consumption to articles of luxury. H.R. 25 seemingly addresses this important concern by creating a “family consumption allowance”, but which rations tax-free necessities of life by the dollar amount of the allowance.

In addition, the family consumption allowance entitles those who do not work for a living nor contribute into the common treasury to receive the allowance. Drug dealers and drug addicts are entitled to the allowance; burglars, armed robbers and car thieves are also entitled to the allowance; prostitutes and bookies and, even your local un-wed welfare moms who stay at home, do not contribute into the common treasury but makes babies to increase their current monthly welfare check, are entitled to the allowance. As a matter of fact the above would be getting an approximate $400 per month bonus under H.R. 25 for either breaking the law or sitting at home making babies.

The family consumption allowance happens to be a socialist windfall to the slugs and leaches in our society, and, would be a gift to Senator Ted Socialist Kennedy and his disciples in Congress who would gladly promise to increase the family consumption allowance during elections to buy votes and remain in power!

The family consumption allowance would create a new and massive voting constituency dependant upon government for a monthly government check. Why in the world would any freedom loving person support such a plan over our founding fathers original tax plan?

Hopefully Sean Hannity, if he has not already done so, will take the time to compare the founding fathers original tax plan to H.R. 25 and then discuss the two with Neal Boortz who has failed to compare the two plans on his show. The Boortz show has become a platform to pimp his book and promote H.R. 25 with a grab bag of misleading information, inaccurate statements, and even outright lies. Boortz appears to be intentionally avoiding the undesirable consequences which H.R. 25 would bring if the plan were to be adopted.

In my opinion, the only tax reform freedom loving Americans need is to have the following words added to our Constitution:

The Sixteenth Amendment is hereby repealed and Congress is henceforth forbidden to lay ``any`` tax or burden calculated from profits, gains, interest, salaries, wages, tips, inheritances or any other lawfully realized money

See how easy real tax reform is? It doesn’t take 135 pages of bullstuff and gobblygoo, [H.R.25] which would leave us on a sinking ship and entrench our nation with more socialism and big government…it only takes 32 words for the people of America to re-establish a fair system of taxation, our Founder’s original plan, which would also gain control of a runaway Congress!

Regards,

JWK___ a proud supporter of our founding father’s original tax reform plan.

05-13-2006, 06:05 PM	#16
GtmFeqJJ Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 508 Senior Member	I am curious if anyone here knows if Sean Hannity actually supports H.R. 25, or if he is undecided and merely leaning in favor of H.R. 25. I understand he is scheduling a public event the 24th of this month with Neal Boortz who promotes H.R. 25. I am also curious to know if anyone here knows if Sean Hannity has ever compaired H.R. 25 to our nations original tax plan which contains a number of self regulating checks and balances which were intentionally designed to create a fair tax system and also designed to control the fiscal conduct of Congress. For example, the founder’s plan provides a method to extinguish deficits in a timely manner and by a fixed rule of apportionment which today‘s socialists in Congress and friends of big government dread. H. R. 25 by contrast is designed to support existing big government and socialist programs which are financed by borrowing and deficit spending, without a fixed rule to extinguish deficits. Our founding fathers’ original tax plan was also designed to allow Congress to tax consumption, but in a manner in which the limit of tax on each particular article taxed would be determined by the market place, and was intended to not tax the necessities of life nor tools of production and supplies necessary in conducting trade. The founder’s intended each specific article of consumption to be intentionally selected for taxation, and then an appropriate amount of tax levied upon each specific article chosen. By contrast, H.R. 25 is an across the board percentage tax on the sale of property which interferes with the market place determining the limit of taxation on each specific article chosen for taxation. H. R. 25 also defies the founder’s intention to limit taxes on consumption to articles of luxury. H.R. 25 seemingly addresses this important concern by creating a “family consumption allowance”, but which rations tax-free necessities of life by the dollar amount of the allowance. In addition, the family consumption allowance entitles those who do not work for a living nor contribute into the common treasury to receive the allowance. Drug dealers and drug addicts are entitled to the allowance; burglars, armed robbers and car thieves are also entitled to the allowance; prostitutes and bookies and, even your local un-wed welfare moms who stay at home, do not contribute into the common treasury but makes babies to increase their current monthly welfare check, are entitled to the allowance. As a matter of fact the above would be getting an approximate $400 per month bonus under H.R. 25 for either breaking the law or sitting at home making babies. The family consumption allowance happens to be a socialist windfall to the slugs and leaches in our society, and, would be a gift to Senator Ted Socialist Kennedy and his disciples in Congress who would gladly promise to increase the family consumption allowance during elections to buy votes and remain in power! The family consumption allowance would create a new and massive voting constituency dependant upon government for a monthly government check. Why in the world would any freedom loving person support such a plan over our founding fathers original tax plan? Hopefully Sean Hannity, if he has not already done so, will take the time to compare the founding fathers original tax plan to H.R. 25 and then discuss the two with Neal Boortz who has failed to compare the two plans on his show. The Boortz show has become a platform to pimp his book and promote H.R. 25 with a grab bag of misleading information, inaccurate statements, and even outright lies. Boortz appears to be intentionally avoiding the undesirable consequences which H.R. 25 would bring if the plan were to be adopted. In my opinion, the only tax reform freedom loving Americans need is to have the following words added to our Constitution: The Sixteenth Amendment is hereby repealed and Congress is henceforth forbidden to lay ``any`` tax or burden calculated from profits, gains, interest, salaries, wages, tips, inheritances or any other lawfully realized money See how easy real tax reform is? It doesn’t take 135 pages of bullstuff and gobblygoo, [H.R.25] which would leave us on a sinking ship and entrench our nation with more socialism and big government…it only takes 32 words for the people of America to re-establish a fair system of taxation, our Founder’s original plan, which would also gain control of a runaway Congress! Regards, JWK___ a proud supporter of our founding father’s original tax reform plan.
	Quote