DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**mr.supervideogoodfd** · 11-09-2005, 07:00 AM

...What about cases, in which the city has bought out all but a few of the properties, and these individual properties refuse to sell. Should these certain individuals be allowed to halt the progress of an entire city?

As a matter of fact, the answer is "yes". It is easy to sit there and make the theoretical statements, but, when they are coming for your house, you'll be sorry you didn't back other people up.

This ruling opens the door for the use of "discretion" by government entities. I know of no government official or entity that shows an ounce of it. We are in a society where money speaks and the more money you have the more your voice is heard. This is an absolute attack on small property owners and escalates the subversive class warfare already underway through our tax system revisions.

11-09-2005, 07:00 AM	#3
mr.supervideogoodfd Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 456 Senior Member	...What about cases, in which the city has bought out all but a few of the properties, and these individual properties refuse to sell. Should these certain individuals be allowed to halt the progress of an entire city? As a matter of fact, the answer is "yes". It is easy to sit there and make the theoretical statements, but, when they are coming for your house, you'll be sorry you didn't back other people up. This ruling opens the door for the use of "discretion" by government entities. I know of no government official or entity that shows an ounce of it. We are in a society where money speaks and the more money you have the more your voice is heard. This is an absolute attack on small property owners and escalates the subversive class warfare already underway through our tax system revisions.
	Quote