DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Nypbscao** · 07-30-2007, 04:20 PM

It would be handy to see pics of some of these places that they are trying to get domain on....

I feel very strongly for teh owners/residents but if these buildings are only being held together by the will of god (or some other amicable diety) and literally are a blight that should be condemned, then the issue becomes hazy.

One thing that is NOT hazy is the cost for these people. They should not only be paid what their current property IS worth, but a portion of what the projected value of the land would be after development.

They should be made unwilling partners, non-culpable for any shortcomings, and privy/eligible to any profits made by the redevelopment.

If you are forcing someone out and still making (lots of) money off of that, something just is not right....

07-30-2007, 04:20 PM	#44
Nypbscao Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 396 Senior Member	It would be handy to see pics of some of these places that they are trying to get domain on.... I feel very strongly for teh owners/residents but if these buildings are only being held together by the will of god (or some other amicable diety) and literally are a blight that should be condemned, then the issue becomes hazy. One thing that is NOT hazy is the cost for these people. They should not only be paid what their current property IS worth, but a portion of what the projected value of the land would be after development. They should be made unwilling partners, non-culpable for any shortcomings, and privy/eligible to any profits made by the redevelopment. If you are forcing someone out and still making (lots of) money off of that, something just is not right....
	Quote