[Jasonstawnosaa]

The problem is the reluctance to shed the electoral vote system.

It was originally intended for two reasons. 1, to have it as a filter to any unreasonable action. If an electoral college wanted to, it could vote against the popular vote. I do think they would need just reason though...

2, they were set up to try to lend power to the states in regards to who gets elected and why. If NJ did not like someone (in colonial days) they could have ery well timmed the balance. Almost any state, or small grouping could have.

Problem is that now we have so many states, and so many population concentrations, the whole system is lopsided. I think they should start making it so that elctoral districts themselves get to decide where their vote goes rather than the state they are in. I know this will have all sorts of problems, including the creative border establishment of voting districts, but at the same time I would rather a states votes go teh way the state votes rather than what the majority, how ever slim, votes.

Another solution would be to just make it so that the winner of a state would get the majority of a states votes rounded to their advantage, but not all of them. This way, states like NY and CA would not be ignored if there was a possibility of getting some votes from these heavily populated areas.


But no. Black White, Red Blue, On Off.

Amazing that we, as analog critters, can be so digital about decision making sometimes....