DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Ztcgtqvb** · 11-09-2005, 01:46 AM

I have beef, don't get me wrong (like I'd be married right now if it weren't for him) but it could be a lot worse. He could be Pataki.

The gay marriage thing last year I blame mostly on his precarious position as a GOP darling as opposed to his actual social views. I think that since this election is in the bag for him, he'll change his mind sometime during the next term since he has nothing to lose.

In any case, despite Gavin Newsom's best efforts in San Francisco, the marriages that he approved were eventually all declared null and void anyway. Also, marriages in Massachusetts, Canada and Connecticut are already recognized here; not to mention that domestic partners share almost all of the same benefits as spouses; so I predict it won't be much longer before the real deal is legalized in this state.

In any case, what's the state of that case in the Court of Appeals?

11-09-2005, 01:46 AM	#12
Ztcgtqvb Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 528 Senior Member	I have beef, don't get me wrong (like I'd be married right now if it weren't for him) but it could be a lot worse. He could be Pataki. The gay marriage thing last year I blame mostly on his precarious position as a GOP darling as opposed to his actual social views. I think that since this election is in the bag for him, he'll change his mind sometime during the next term since he has nothing to lose. In any case, despite Gavin Newsom's best efforts in San Francisco, the marriages that he approved were eventually all declared null and void anyway. Also, marriages in Massachusetts, Canada and Connecticut are already recognized here; not to mention that domestic partners share almost all of the same benefits as spouses; so I predict it won't be much longer before the real deal is legalized in this state. In any case, what's the state of that case in the Court of Appeals?
	Quote