DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**seicslybearee** · 12-22-2008, 01:15 PM

i sometimes get suckered into this bigger megapixel thing a lot too. but here is my very very honest and unbiased view about d40

right now i believe d40 is one of the great price performance cameras. even tho the megapixel count 10.2 vs. 6 looks "wooooooooooowww!!" but real life sizes aren't hugely effected.

also you might want to read this article here

d40 still has great iso performance i will get into more detail why i think that way but rite now a little lazy

That article is for point and shoot cameras. If you were to apply it do DSLRs it would be ~54megapixels. Though you'd be hard pressed to find any lens that gave that kind of res

Though I agree with the basic concept somewhat. That's why I went with the 10mp a300 over the 14mp a350. But I'd trade both for the 24mp a900 in a second

.

12-22-2008, 01:15 PM	#12
seicslybearee Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 422 Senior Member	i sometimes get suckered into this bigger megapixel thing a lot too. but here is my very very honest and unbiased view about d40 right now i believe d40 is one of the great price performance cameras. even tho the megapixel count 10.2 vs. 6 looks "wooooooooooowww!!" but real life sizes aren't hugely effected. also you might want to read this article here d40 still has great iso performance i will get into more detail why i think that way but rite now a little lazy That article is for point and shoot cameras. If you were to apply it do DSLRs it would be ~54megapixels. Though you'd be hard pressed to find any lens that gave that kind of res Though I agree with the basic concept somewhat. That's why I went with the 10mp a300 over the 14mp a350. But I'd trade both for the 24mp a900 in a second .
	Quote