[jgztw2es]

Uh..yes that was before house

--- Post Update ---

I didn't bring up "the gay stuff", I mentioned the large amount of straight actors that play gay roles because it's the same exact example that you made. In the same way that a gay actor playing a straight guy confuses you, the same should happen when it's a straight actor playing a gay man. The film Philadelphia must have been quite a let down for you.

Well yes, if there would be a movie in which charlie sheen is gay, it will indeed hurt it's believability

That's not only an extreme example which will never happen but also a "what if" argument.

Besides, I don't think Adam Sandler would fit any role except as a stand in for a turd.

"It's time to shoot the turd scene guys, Ok, call Sandler from his trailer"

Also props on using the most one dimensional actor in the history of film in your example.

Well of course it's an extreme example. One uses extreme examples to prove a point.... Because apparently if the example isn't extreme enough you don't understand it.
And once again, yes adam sandler might not be a good actor, but that's not the point. I said that even if he did manage to do an excellent job, it would still be less convincing