DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**N1bNXuDb** · 09-04-2012, 03:22 AM

how exactly did the saudis take over hijaz if the did not go against the khalifah then?

btw arab mujahideen (at least in afghanistan) cannot even bear to use the name saudi arabia. they still use the name hijaz and take offense when they hear saudi arabia.

The arabs hated beign ruled over by non arabs(turks). Brits wanted to topple/destabalize the ottomans. so they made a deal with the arab tribe leaders. and it is the descendants of those very same tribe leaders who are in charge today of the respected countries.

A fatwa was passed on the turks that they were involved in shirk and thus killing them was halal. mass slaughter took place. then those tribal leaders who had helped most were given the countries their descendants rule today. fake borders were erected to carve our these territories and thus,modern day middle east was born.

09-04-2012, 03:22 AM	#35
N1bNXuDb Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 538 Senior Member	how exactly did the saudis take over hijaz if the did not go against the khalifah then? btw arab mujahideen (at least in afghanistan) cannot even bear to use the name saudi arabia. they still use the name hijaz and take offense when they hear saudi arabia. The arabs hated beign ruled over by non arabs(turks). Brits wanted to topple/destabalize the ottomans. so they made a deal with the arab tribe leaders. and it is the descendants of those very same tribe leaders who are in charge today of the respected countries. A fatwa was passed on the turks that they were involved in shirk and thus killing them was halal. mass slaughter took place. then those tribal leaders who had helped most were given the countries their descendants rule today. fake borders were erected to carve our these territories and thus,modern day middle east was born.
	Quote