DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**stoneeZef** · 07-02-2012, 12:30 AM

LOL, that is the rubbish realised by a charlatan called Richard Lynn, an incompetent sociologist, that wouldn't find any kind of visibility by the medias if he didn't realise such controversial researches.

those datas are not IQ results, but they are based on the PISA TESTS by the Programme for International Student Assessment, they calculate the level of knowledge of students in different subjects, like reading and mathematics, not the IQ, that is a completely different thing.
Better quality of teaching is equal to higher knowledge in the school subjects.

I'm wondering what is the IQ of people that believe to all crap found in the net.

07-02-2012, 12:30 AM	#3
stoneeZef Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 478 Senior Member	LOL, that is the rubbish realised by a charlatan called Richard Lynn, an incompetent sociologist, that wouldn't find any kind of visibility by the medias if he didn't realise such controversial researches. those datas are not IQ results, but they are based on the PISA TESTS by the Programme for International Student Assessment, they calculate the level of knowledge of students in different subjects, like reading and mathematics, not the IQ, that is a completely different thing. Better quality of teaching is equal to higher knowledge in the school subjects. I'm wondering what is the IQ of people that believe to all crap found in the net.
	Quote