Thread: Celts
View Single Post
Old 06-25-2012, 02:30 AM   #12
Gooracouppy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
443
Senior Member
Default
Oh I see. Well just because they didn't recognise their similarity to each other and relationship it doesn't mean we shoudn't.
For a book that goes the other way check out Barry Cunliffe's "the Ancient Celts". It actually upholds the traditional frame work for understanding "Celts".

There are some serious theoretical problems to understanding "Celto-ethnogenesis" though. For instance are we absolutely sure that Halstatt culture really was ethno-linguistically related to the people of NW Europe?

Also are we really sure that everyone of Iron age France was a type of "Celt", y'know similar to NW Europe ethno-linguistic identities. I don't believe Vercingetorix referred to himself as such and his people weren't necessarily referring to themselves as Gauls either.

Continental "Celtic" differs greatly from Insular Celtic.

I enjoy the problems of understanding "Our Ancestors the Gauls" (as Michael Dietler sarcastically put it) and I don't think the traditional frame work is 100% bogus but do enjoy playing devils advocate regarding "Celts".
Gooracouppy is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:30 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity