DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Weislenalkata** · 12-24-2010, 05:50 AM

#2. I have a kid now and besides, I don't have any connections.

It's prohibition 2.0, and it's working about as well as the original. The only difference is the duration.

Legalize, regulate & tax. The outcome would be more good than bad (as with any policy, there will be good and bad outcomes).

Ah, but then what do you do with coke, heroin, acid, etc.? Logically, the answer is the same. But those are scarier than pot.

-Arrian

I can never see a reason for fully legalizing and taxing meth as it is currently consumed by addicts.

12-24-2010, 05:50 AM	#15
Weislenalkata Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 429 Senior Member	#2. I have a kid now and besides, I don't have any connections. It's prohibition 2.0, and it's working about as well as the original. The only difference is the duration. Legalize, regulate & tax. The outcome would be more good than bad (as with any policy, there will be good and bad outcomes). Ah, but then what do you do with coke, heroin, acid, etc.? Logically, the answer is the same. But those are scarier than pot. -Arrian I can never see a reason for fully legalizing and taxing meth as it is currently consumed by addicts.
	Quote