DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - Ann Coulter wants voting age increased to 26

**idobestbuyonlinepp** · 11-19-2010, 11:20 PM

You are so ****ing stupid.

FIRST OF ALL. People graduate from 4-year colleges at TWENTY TWO. That is FOUR YEARS EARLIER than 26. Add in 2 years for a master's degree if you want and that's still TWENTY FOUR.

Not if you take a gap year, you work for a couple years and then go back to school, or you go for a PhD, etc. I know TONS of people still doing post-secondary education at 26.

You seem to have no concept of how other people function in this world. Not everyone is you.

SECONDLY. Do you think it makes the insurance any less expensive to force them to support kids up to 26 as opposed to giving parents the option to purchase such a plan? If yes, have you ever suffered brain damage? I think it is quite obvious that if it was not required of insurance companies, no companies would offer it -- or if they did offer it, the cost of such a system would be so high that companies would not ever get it.

The end result is your country will put further disincentives into post-secondary education by increasing the real-world cost to the students. That is BAD for your country long-term.

Let me amend: Asher is extremely smart when talking about anything OTHER than insurance. Or the military. Your problem is very simple: lack of perspective. People aren't stupid for having different political opinions than you -- in fact, you are stupid for thinking others stupid for having a different view on politics.

I think it's ****ing retarded to ask 18 year old freshmen to pay for health insurance. Do you have any concept of how expensive health insurance is, HC? Do you have any concept of how expensive tuition is? Textbooks? Lodging and food? You've not ever gone to college, you've never lived outside of your parents' house with 18 bathrooms -- how can we expect you to understand the financial burden college students already face?

11-19-2010, 11:20 PM	#11
idobestbuyonlinepp Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 589 Senior Member	You are so **ing stupid. FIRST OF ALL. People graduate from 4-year colleges at TWENTY TWO. That is FOUR YEARS EARLIER than 26. Add in 2 years for a master's degree if you want and that's still TWENTY FOUR. Not if you take a gap year, you work for a couple years and then go back to school, or you go for a PhD, etc. I know TONS of people still doing post-secondary education at 26. You seem to have no concept of how other people function in this world. Not everyone is you. SECONDLY. Do you think it makes the insurance any less expensive to force them to support kids up to 26 as opposed to giving parents the option to purchase such a plan? If yes, have you ever suffered brain damage? I think it is quite obvious that if it was not required of insurance companies, no companies would offer it -- or if they did offer it, the cost of such a system would be so high that companies would not ever get it. The end result is your country will put further disincentives into post-secondary education by increasing the real-world cost to the students. That is BAD for your country long-term. Let me amend: Asher is extremely smart when talking about anything OTHER than insurance. Or the military. Your problem is very simple: lack of perspective. People aren't stupid for having different political opinions than you -- in fact, you are stupid for thinking others stupid for having a different view on politics. I think it's **ing retarded to ask 18 year old freshmen to pay for health insurance. Do you have any concept of how expensive health insurance is, HC? Do you have any concept of how expensive tuition is? Textbooks? Lodging and food? You've not ever gone to college, you've never lived outside of your parents' house with 18 bathrooms -- how can we expect you to understand the financial burden college students already face?
	Quote