If it comes to “protecting once family†they are not that different. Surely there are wars and killings between gangs in same prison, there are no wars and killings between families in same village or city. But members of same ordinary families are sent to war for the tribe or country and eagerly kill members of other ordinary families of different tribe, religion or country. The biggest difference, in my opinion, is that gang members are usually emotionally unstable, brain damaged or psychopathic, compared to members of ordinary family. They war more often and actually might experience pleasure derived from torturing and killing others.
This sounds very homocentric, and it comes only from not enough observation of our closest relatives. I’m pretty sure you will find your, above mentioned, examples in primates or even other social mammals like pack of wolfs, or deer.
There is no such thing as pre-moral. If morality is understanding and election of right and wrong, what pre-moral is then? Recognition of pre-right and pre-wrong, or sort of right and maybe wrong?
I have to admit you lost me here. Let’s have an example:Least corrupt country is Denmark - Most corrupt is Somalia, by these standards:Are you saying that Somalia has more morality and less personal freedoms than Denmark? By more morality, do you mean more moral person or more moral laws?
You are painting a very sad picture of human nature. I’m glad I’ve escaped “communismâ€, the dictator ship of proletariat. Another example of dead end morality.
Thanks for engaging in this subject. We don’t see eye to eye, but it is very interesting to hear others perspective.