DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**c2siOlIk** · 07-21-2009, 01:38 AM

Why not:

Alta California and

Baja California Norte.

Wow! Ben knows his California history...and at least a dab of Spanish

Traditionally, the proposal has been along the crest of the Tehachapi Mountains. That would put the city of Santa Barbara in Southern California but most of the rest of that county in Northern California. Then the line stretches east passed the Sierras and then almost north to take in Owens Valley.

It's a matter of geography. Southern California is a desert. Northern California is farmland, ranches and pine-covered mountains. And politics. Southern California is liberal. Most of Northern California [aside from San Francisco, Big Sur] is conservative. And its a matter of baseball. We have the Dodgers.

They have the Giants.

07-21-2009, 01:38 AM	#10
c2siOlIk Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 461 Senior Member	Why not: Alta California and Baja California Norte. Wow! Ben knows his California history...and at least a dab of Spanish Traditionally, the proposal has been along the crest of the Tehachapi Mountains. That would put the city of Santa Barbara in Southern California but most of the rest of that county in Northern California. Then the line stretches east passed the Sierras and then almost north to take in Owens Valley. It's a matter of geography. Southern California is a desert. Northern California is farmland, ranches and pine-covered mountains. And politics. Southern California is liberal. Most of Northern California [aside from San Francisco, Big Sur] is conservative. And its a matter of baseball. We have the Dodgers. They have the Giants.
	Quote