DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**VowJoyday** · 06-18-2009, 08:31 PM

I don't have to, You've dug yourself into the hole already. As you stated, you don't have the understanding of a child.

I posted that Obama ran on a open government platform but doesn't seem to be living up to it.

Fine. Non-issue.

I did not say whether I approved of what he was doing or not, just that this is different then what Obama promised when he was campainging. Yup, the line "I feel sorry for all the suckers that fell for all his snake oil lies." certainly doesn't state your opinion on the situation.

Which makes him the hypocrite, not me. That's a huge leap in logic, but then so was your last sentence. You clearly aren't basing anything in reality.

Then you attacked the repugs which has NOTHING to do with my original post. I addressed the topic of the article. If you don't think that it is part of your original post, then you've lost it. Even Arrian made the exact same comment that I did. So yes, I did "attack" the repugs (conservatives more accurately) for making a big deal out of this now when Bush and Cheney had done it long before. It was a fair comment to make. You, however, couldn't handle it. That's becasue you were silent during Bush's transgressions and are now loudly denouncing these actions under Obama. So, yes, you are a hypocrit in that sense (also, you post after mine had the grammar of a five year old).

I then pointed out partisian politics at work. Fine. Nowhere did I deny that the Dems should support it under Obama.

A concept that you obviously seem to have a problem understanding. This is where your faulty logic and personal bias expose you as a hypocrit. Apparently, you believe that you can read my mind: "Your thinking that it's just one party that does this is Sooooooo naive. Partisian politics is the norm, not the exception. Geeze."

By your own logic, the previous statement that you made, which was a mirror of mine (although extremely poorly written), would have you "thinking it's just one party that does this." Hence, criticizing me for something that you do and believe (by your own logic, mind you) is hypocritical.

Please point out any statement that I made that was hypocritical? Done. See above.

And the waiting continues.

As if you weren't petty enough.

The lesson here is that you should just stick with personal attacks. That seems to be all you're good for (although, they are rather lame). And the good thing here is that you've been exposed as the partisan hypocrit that you are. Seriously Rah, you should learn when to shut up.

06-18-2009, 08:31 PM	#26
VowJoyday Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 532 Senior Member	I don't have to, You've dug yourself into the hole already. As you stated, you don't have the understanding of a child. I posted that Obama ran on a open government platform but doesn't seem to be living up to it. Fine. Non-issue. I did not say whether I approved of what he was doing or not, just that this is different then what Obama promised when he was campainging. Yup, the line "I feel sorry for all the suckers that fell for all his snake oil lies." certainly doesn't state your opinion on the situation. Which makes him the hypocrite, not me. That's a huge leap in logic, but then so was your last sentence. You clearly aren't basing anything in reality. Then you attacked the repugs which has NOTHING to do with my original post. I addressed the topic of the article. If you don't think that it is part of your original post, then you've lost it. Even Arrian made the exact same comment that I did. So yes, I did "attack" the repugs (conservatives more accurately) for making a big deal out of this now when Bush and Cheney had done it long before. It was a fair comment to make. You, however, couldn't handle it. That's becasue you were silent during Bush's transgressions and are now loudly denouncing these actions under Obama. So, yes, you are a hypocrit in that sense (also, you post after mine had the grammar of a five year old). I then pointed out partisian politics at work. Fine. Nowhere did I deny that the Dems should support it under Obama. A concept that you obviously seem to have a problem understanding. This is where your faulty logic and personal bias expose you as a hypocrit. Apparently, you believe that you can read my mind: "Your thinking that it's just one party that does this is Sooooooo naive. Partisian politics is the norm, not the exception. Geeze." By your own logic, the previous statement that you made, which was a mirror of mine (although extremely poorly written), would have you "thinking it's just one party that does this." Hence, criticizing me for something that you do and believe (by your own logic, mind you) is hypocritical. Please point out any statement that I made that was hypocritical? Done. See above. And the waiting continues. As if you weren't petty enough. The lesson here is that you should just stick with personal attacks. That seems to be all you're good for (although, they are rather lame). And the good thing here is that you've been exposed as the partisan hypocrit that you are. Seriously Rah, you should learn when to shut up.
	Quote