DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**kaysions** · 11-03-2011, 11:15 AM

These statues and images were created not to create erotic thoughts nor to stimulate demented sensations and fantasies. The "intent" reveals itself through the structures of the statues which were given shape in such as a way so that their "intent" would not be pornographic. There is no reason to censure that which is natural just like there is no reason to censure such behavior or actions in the context of a relationship.

I know. I don't think that they are pornographic. What I am saying is that someone else did.

That is what I meant by asking what is pornography and who gets to decide.

11-03-2011, 11:15 AM	#13
kaysions Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 317 Senior Member	These statues and images were created not to create erotic thoughts nor to stimulate demented sensations and fantasies. The "intent" reveals itself through the structures of the statues which were given shape in such as a way so that their "intent" would not be pornographic. There is no reason to censure that which is natural just like there is no reason to censure such behavior or actions in the context of a relationship. I know. I don't think that they are pornographic. What I am saying is that someone else did. That is what I meant by asking what is pornography and who gets to decide.
	Quote