DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**vintsqyuid** · 02-06-2011, 08:17 AM

Do those faces in the picture look above-average to anyone else, or just me?

The 'average' girl is not that attractive, at least not where I live… is the "average" marker misleading?

an average morph does not connote an "average" girl. rather the science of attraction says that we are attracted to those who display the most "average" (tehnically, the mean) facial metrics within a population, that is to say, the one that possesses the mean inter-eye distance, nasal length, philtrum length, etc is one we find to be most attractive. the problem is though, very few within a population actually possess the combination of all these average facial metrics, therefore, the "average" girl is much less attractive than the "average" morph, which is given to be mean of the all metrics w/in the population.

02-06-2011, 08:17 AM	#22
vintsqyuid Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 498 Senior Member	Do those faces in the picture look above-average to anyone else, or just me? The 'average' girl is not that attractive, at least not where I live… is the "average" marker misleading? an average morph does not connote an "average" girl. rather the science of attraction says that we are attracted to those who display the most "average" (tehnically, the mean) facial metrics within a population, that is to say, the one that possesses the mean inter-eye distance, nasal length, philtrum length, etc is one we find to be most attractive. the problem is though, very few within a population actually possess the combination of all these average facial metrics, therefore, the "average" girl is much less attractive than the "average" morph, which is given to be mean of the all metrics w/in the population.
	Quote