DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**qd0vhq4f** · 12-12-2011, 02:42 AM

No one is "pure". I'm not sure how one would go about comparing such a thing.

Congoids (and Australoids?), considering that they do not have any Neanderthal admixture.

Most Sub-Saharan Africans, with the exception of certain West Africans, show signs of some other archaic admixture, especially hunter-gatherers (around 2%).

Aboriginal Australians have Neanderthal and Denisovan admixture.

12-12-2011, 02:42 AM	#11
qd0vhq4f Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 585 Senior Member	No one is "pure". I'm not sure how one would go about comparing such a thing. Congoids (and Australoids?), considering that they do not have any Neanderthal admixture. Most Sub-Saharan Africans, with the exception of certain West Africans, show signs of some other archaic admixture, especially hunter-gatherers (around 2%). Aboriginal Australians have Neanderthal and Denisovan admixture.
	Quote