View Single Post
Old 08-18-2010, 04:11 AM   #35
TyncTyncSah

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
569
Senior Member
Default
Light skinned Africans. duh.

---------- Post added 2010-08-17 at 20:15 ----------

I fully agree with you that phenotypic diversity is not the result of admixture. But the "Fulani" cluster in the Tishkoff study is relatively close to the "Cushitic" cluster, and people with ancestry from the Cushitic cluster are closer to Eurasia on the plots than Niger-Kordofanian people are. Even though Tishkoff believes that these clusters are all indigenous to Africa, and part of African genetic diversity.

This is why Bandar said that they would have a "pull" towards Eurasia compared to other West Africans, he didn't mean to say that they are West Africans with Eurasian admixture.
True, bot the Fulani and Cushitic ancestral groups cluster together for the most part in regard to linkage with the other ancestral clusters... and while they're closer to the non-African clusters, it's not by much... it's not intermediate.

On the other hand, the Fulani people are MUCH more closer to the other Niger-Kordofanian speaking populations. They overlap and cluster together.
TyncTyncSah is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:44 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity