DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - An invitation to Curiouscat, let's discuss genetics on this thread, just me and you

**blackjackblax** · 06-23-2011, 05:21 AM

I've noticed you've made an excuse of all the long posts and your confused ambiguity concerning Turkish genetics so I've started this thread to make it clearer and more straightforward, where I ask no one else to become involved so this issue can be settled. Please disregard this part of the post so we can get straight to the point.

What is it you are arguing Curioscat?

The first argument I am making is that people such as myself, who have no identity other than Turkish and speak only Turkish as their mother tongue are ethnic Turks. I have provided a source which you have not even mentioned. When a source is provided, you have every right to reject it, however you must explain why. The Encyclopedia Britannica is a well respected source and agrees with me on the concept of ethnic Turks.

The second argument I am making is that ethnic Turks are considered Turkic, another well-known fact which is supported by the Encyclopedia Britannica.

I would like to know, clearly and directly, what your arguments against my two assertions are?

06-23-2011, 05:21 AM	#1
blackjackblax Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 538 Senior Member	An invitation to Curiouscat, let's discuss genetics on this thread, just me and you I've noticed you've made an excuse of all the long posts and your confused ambiguity concerning Turkish genetics so I've started this thread to make it clearer and more straightforward, where I ask no one else to become involved so this issue can be settled. Please disregard this part of the post so we can get straight to the point. What is it you are arguing Curioscat? The first argument I am making is that people such as myself, who have no identity other than Turkish and speak only Turkish as their mother tongue are ethnic Turks. I have provided a source which you have not even mentioned. When a source is provided, you have every right to reject it, however you must explain why. The Encyclopedia Britannica is a well respected source and agrees with me on the concept of ethnic Turks. The second argument I am making is that ethnic Turks are considered Turkic, another well-known fact which is supported by the Encyclopedia Britannica. I would like to know, clearly and directly, what your arguments against my two assertions are?
	Quote