DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - An invitation to Curiouscat, let's discuss genetics on this thread, just me and you

**SteantyjetMaw** · 06-23-2011, 09:10 AM

Yeah it's over, I sometimes forget how much people can differ in intelligence. It really is wrong to get angry with someone because they cannot understand something, regardless of how much one has simplified it. Yea, thats really intelligent

Yes, that is what I meant, as is clearly explained in both posts. The natives did not have a Turkish identity before the arrival of central-Asian Turks, no. See, its easy to clarify, why didn't you clarify the last 3 times I asked you? would have saved you getting your knickers in a twist.

Yes, because by 'those people' we were referring to Turks of genetically identical origin to the populations you mention. Is it becoming more understandable for you now? No, I was clearly referring to Albanians/Greeks/Kurds and not to those of "genetically identical origin" as is seen in that post.
However, thats ok, I have got used to you misinterpreting what is written.

The reference is to people of, say, an identical genetic background to an Armenian, who has no identity other than a Turkish identity. That person is considered an 'ethnic Turk'. You mean, the people that don't know their "real" historic heritage can be considered ethnic Turks. Similar to that singer that recently found out he was Armenian and immediately went to the SE to find out more about his roots.

There is no point answering that post as you could not comprehend what I was saying. You were essentially having a discussion with yourself, portraying me to have said things I didn't say. Because you can't.

As for my acceptance of opinions; I cannot accept idiotic ones, I am very happy to accept viable ones. As for what constitutes an idiotic opinion, an example would be challenging the nature of established facts with no evidence to back it up. You see my frustration arises from your lack of grasp for the subject. Really, so when the source that you posted (and found all by yourself lol) Contradicts what you are saying about Turks, you will have a meltdown and start insulting. How very not idiotic of you

I just have a very low tolerance for low intelligence. I don't mind being classified by yourself as having an ugly character, the mere fact that our personalities conflict shows me that I differ from yourself, which is cause for happiness in itself Good boy, finding happiness from an internet forum, very intelligent of you.

06-23-2011, 09:10 AM	#20
SteantyjetMaw Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 566 Senior Member	Yeah it's over, I sometimes forget how much people can differ in intelligence. It really is wrong to get angry with someone because they cannot understand something, regardless of how much one has simplified it. Yea, thats really intelligent Yes, that is what I meant, as is clearly explained in both posts. The natives did not have a Turkish identity before the arrival of central-Asian Turks, no. See, its easy to clarify, why didn't you clarify the last 3 times I asked you? would have saved you getting your knickers in a twist. Yes, because by 'those people' we were referring to Turks of genetically identical origin to the populations you mention. Is it becoming more understandable for you now? No, I was clearly referring to Albanians/Greeks/Kurds and not to those of "genetically identical origin" as is seen in that post. However, thats ok, I have got used to you misinterpreting what is written. The reference is to people of, say, an identical genetic background to an Armenian, who has no identity other than a Turkish identity. That person is considered an 'ethnic Turk'. You mean, the people that don't know their "real" historic heritage can be considered ethnic Turks. Similar to that singer that recently found out he was Armenian and immediately went to the SE to find out more about his roots. There is no point answering that post as you could not comprehend what I was saying. You were essentially having a discussion with yourself, portraying me to have said things I didn't say. Because you can't. As for my acceptance of opinions; I cannot accept idiotic ones, I am very happy to accept viable ones. As for what constitutes an idiotic opinion, an example would be challenging the nature of established facts with no evidence to back it up. You see my frustration arises from your lack of grasp for the subject. Really, so when the source that you posted (and found all by yourself lol) Contradicts what you are saying about Turks, you will have a meltdown and start insulting. How very not idiotic of you I just have a very low tolerance for low intelligence. I don't mind being classified by yourself as having an ugly character, the mere fact that our personalities conflict shows me that I differ from yourself, which is cause for happiness in itself Good boy, finding happiness from an internet forum, very intelligent of you.
	Quote