From what I've read and heard DeKlerk was a pragmatist and a reluctant reformer; his history was that of a fairly hard right-winger in the NP, perhaps it was just a time and place thing, if he had been President 10 years earlier than he was would he have initiated the reform process? Plus he sought a democratic mandate to continue the reform process in 1992 (the big vote), is it not possible he was hoping the result would have come out against continuing reform? Is the ANC as corrupt as everyone says? They seem to have a lot of support still, in the townships etc I consider their views pretty stupid but are they corrupt in the way most African rulers are (i.e. stealing from the coffers of gov't)?
It's difficult for me to comprehend how Apartheid coerced and oppressed the Boers by lumping them with other whites. That the ANC is oppressing whites now does not mean that Apartheid can be turned on its head.
Laksmi for President.