DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - Are Australian aboriginals considered black in Australia?

**jakitula** · 08-11-2011, 09:44 AM

Originally Posted by Dominicanboy Belonging to an ethnic group, or population that posses genetic markers commonly found in another ethnicity/population does not equal admixture. The Hausa share R1b with western Europeans such as Spaniards, at a high frequency; that my friend does not make the Hausa mixed with Spaniards, or Spaniards mixed with Hausa.

more bullshit and denial from you, get over it youre wrong about every point here.
R1b in africans IS evidence of admixture, thats fact wheter you like it or not, because it has a very recent appearance in africa compared to europe and is downstreams derived.

and its not just about phenotype, but also the fact that the "africans" that have features that resemble euroasians do in fact cluster closer to those euroasians compared to pure negroids. so dont give me the natural diversity excuse, its false. more bullshit and denial from you, get over it you're wrong about every point here.
E1b1b in west-eurasia IS evidence of admixture, thats fact whether you like it or not, because it has a very recent appearance in europe compared to africa and is downstreams derived.

and its not just about phenotype, but also the fact that the "west-eurasians" that have features that resemble africans do in fact cluster closer to those africans compared to pure south indians & east-asians. so dont give me the natural diversity excuse, its false.

^I agree that white people's afros and flat nose means E1b1b in europe should be evidence of admixture going by Falsetruth's logic

08-11-2011, 09:44 AM	#23
jakitula Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 457 Senior Member	Originally Posted by Dominicanboy Belonging to an ethnic group, or population that posses genetic markers commonly found in another ethnicity/population does not equal admixture. The Hausa share R1b with western Europeans such as Spaniards, at a high frequency; that my friend does not make the Hausa mixed with Spaniards, or Spaniards mixed with Hausa. more bullshit and denial from you, get over it youre wrong about every point here. R1b in africans IS evidence of admixture, thats fact wheter you like it or not, because it has a very recent appearance in africa compared to europe and is downstreams derived. and its not just about phenotype, but also the fact that the "africans" that have features that resemble euroasians do in fact cluster closer to those euroasians compared to pure negroids. so dont give me the natural diversity excuse, its false. more bullshit and denial from you, get over it you're wrong about every point here. E1b1b in west-eurasia IS evidence of admixture, thats fact whether you like it or not, because it has a very recent appearance in europe compared to africa and is downstreams derived. and its not just about phenotype, but also the fact that the "west-eurasians" that have features that resemble africans do in fact cluster closer to those africans compared to pure south indians & east-asians. so dont give me the natural diversity excuse, its false. ^I agree that white people's afros and flat nose means E1b1b in europe should be evidence of admixture going by Falsetruth's logic
	Quote