My point was that women were not introduced to the job market, or seen as "equals", until after socioeconomic "progress" in the 20th Century. Jobs had always been relegated and regulated by social/traditional gender roles all times prior. Outside Amerika, people do not give gender roles in careers any second-glance. Europeans, for example, wouldn't ever think twice about a woman as a "policeman" or "fireman" or "lawyer" except that it doesn't make sense. Why should a woman be a "policeman"?
When it comes to Latina v White females, Latinas feel no great 'need' or 'urge' to compete with men economically, socially, or politickally speaking. This is why I prefer them, because, they do not feel the need to compensate for what they're not.
If I want a woman for a relationship, I don't want my "equal". I want my "female-half" instead, a woman who can become a mother and tend to children. I don't want some woman faking-it by believing she can compete with me economically, socially, and politickally. This detracts from her becoming a mother, when she should be mothering a child.