View Single Post
Old 07-05-2012, 01:28 PM   #18
lidya-sggf

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
384
Senior Member
Default
And to the person who asked the main question.. Muawiyah raa didnt "attack" rather fitnah makers killed people from both sides to start a fitnah. And later on the two sides agreed to peace and the judgement of the book of Allah.

Also, know that history books, such as Tareekh Al Tabari, mention hadeeths with their chains, saying in the intro that it is up to the reader to look into authenticity. So not everything there is authentic, theres so many weak and fabricated narrations, and many narrations regarding this topic have the shia Abi Mukhnaf in the chain, a known liar, who they rely on very much.
MASHALLAH a good analysis, May ALLAH (SWT) reward you. I heard even Tabari might be a rafidhi and most of the narrators there are shia rawafidh therefore we consider them liars. Hazrat Ameer Muawiyah is a sahabi thats why he has every right to kill anyone he likes. There are loads of Hadith to support this. Shias please dont waste your time here, we will never accept any of your evidence. Muawiyah and Yazeed are the best Muslims, thats why even after their demise, you wouldnt find any shrines made in their honour. They are ahle tawheed and the best salaf.
lidya-sggf is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:36 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity