DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Poreponko** · 04-27-2007, 04:23 AM

Originally posted by Japher

I disagree, sort of. I think she should be offered her job back, and she should respectfully decline. A show of her contributions, but a repremand for her past actions. She obviously did a good job, and that shouldn't be taken from her, unless you think that MIT has produced some idiots over the pass 10-20 years. It's not a reprimand, if they offer her job back. Allowing to resign, allows her to leave with dignity. However, this is a case of the ends not justifying the means. By letting her stay, it opens the door for others to say, "I lied on my resume, but I had full-intention of doing a job. Is that so wrong?" Cheating can not be tolerated.

04-27-2007, 04:23 AM	#6
Poreponko Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 486 Senior Member	Originally posted by Japher I disagree, sort of. I think she should be offered her job back, and she should respectfully decline. A show of her contributions, but a repremand for her past actions. She obviously did a good job, and that shouldn't be taken from her, unless you think that MIT has produced some idiots over the pass 10-20 years. It's not a reprimand, if they offer her job back. Allowing to resign, allows her to leave with dignity. However, this is a case of the ends not justifying the means. By letting her stay, it opens the door for others to say, "I lied on my resume, but I had full-intention of doing a job. Is that so wrong?" Cheating can not be tolerated.
	Quote