DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**cypedembeda** · 09-30-2011, 02:36 PM

...i like aitheists.....not the poorvasrama brahmins.......they very dangerous to brahminism.....like original christian are

tbs, I am one of those poorvashrama brahmins and I have said so myself often. Let me assure you, I am not dangerous at all, I wouldn't hurt anything other than a pesky fly.

Many feel Nachi brings a different perspective and should stay, and I endorse the staying part. But I surely do not appreciate the parting shot, one about anti-brahmin and anti-hindu. If there is anything he does not agree with he should stand up and debate. But he seems to think his pronouncements must be seen as unassailable truths, that just won't do. If he allows these things to give him ulcer, then it is probably good that he leaves, his health is more important than the ephemeral satisfaction of some die-hard theists here.

All said and done, it is clear that the reason Nachi and tbs want to call it quits is because they are offended that their posts, the ones I am sure are pearls of wisdom in their own minds never seen by mankind, got edited out by the owner of this forum. Let us not get misdirected, this is the reason.

This brings out an important difference between those who are open-minded and those who are convinced they are some sort of oracle. My posts got edited several times, I felt bad no doubt, but I tried my best to make peace and did so as well.

Shri Sangom's posts got edited in the past, and he did not nurse any great ill-feeling for long. Happy has been banned temporarily, for no fault of her own if I may add, yet she is contributing with all her might -- whether you agree with her posts or not is a different matter.

So, what is so great about those who are on the "other" side that makes them தொட்டா சிணுங்கி? Why can't they take some lumps we on this side routinely take. They may talk to Praveen by PM and get things sorted out, why not? I have dealt with Praveen by PM and I find him reasonable to the extent you are willing to be. If you let your ego come in the way, -- that is your prerogative -- then it will be difficult. But then, face up to it, don't invent pseudo reasons like anti-brahmin and anti-hindu, these are just சால் ஜாப்பு like KB says, it fits here not where KB uses it.

Let us try to live with each other, we are not mortal enemies, all we have are some disagreements in POV. If I disagree with you it does not automatically mean I hate you, how can that be, I disagree with my dear wife, one I love more than any other, on god?

Cheers!

09-30-2011, 02:36 PM	#33
cypedembeda Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 408 Senior Member	...i like aitheists.....not the poorvasrama brahmins.......they very dangerous to brahminism.....like original christian are tbs, I am one of those poorvashrama brahmins and I have said so myself often. Let me assure you, I am not dangerous at all, I wouldn't hurt anything other than a pesky fly. Many feel Nachi brings a different perspective and should stay, and I endorse the staying part. But I surely do not appreciate the parting shot, one about anti-brahmin and anti-hindu. If there is anything he does not agree with he should stand up and debate. But he seems to think his pronouncements must be seen as unassailable truths, that just won't do. If he allows these things to give him ulcer, then it is probably good that he leaves, his health is more important than the ephemeral satisfaction of some die-hard theists here. All said and done, it is clear that the reason Nachi and tbs want to call it quits is because they are offended that their posts, the ones I am sure are pearls of wisdom in their own minds never seen by mankind, got edited out by the owner of this forum. Let us not get misdirected, this is the reason. This brings out an important difference between those who are open-minded and those who are convinced they are some sort of oracle. My posts got edited several times, I felt bad no doubt, but I tried my best to make peace and did so as well. Shri Sangom's posts got edited in the past, and he did not nurse any great ill-feeling for long. Happy has been banned temporarily, for no fault of her own if I may add, yet she is contributing with all her might -- whether you agree with her posts or not is a different matter. So, what is so great about those who are on the "other" side that makes them தொட்டா சிணுங்கி? Why can't they take some lumps we on this side routinely take. They may talk to Praveen by PM and get things sorted out, why not? I have dealt with Praveen by PM and I find him reasonable to the extent you are willing to be. If you let your ego come in the way, -- that is your prerogative -- then it will be difficult. But then, face up to it, don't invent pseudo reasons like anti-brahmin and anti-hindu, these are just சால் ஜாப்பு like KB says, it fits here not where KB uses it. Let us try to live with each other, we are not mortal enemies, all we have are some disagreements in POV. If I disagree with you it does not automatically mean I hate you, how can that be, I disagree with my dear wife, one I love more than any other, on god? Cheers!
	Quote