DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**beriarele** · 06-08-2010, 02:29 AM

kunjuppu

nachi,

i would rather you comment on the practice, which have strong views on, and my post was confined to.

its your past ideas,i am confronting.not you as a person.now i dont know,if we can seperate the two?

you are attacking me person, which i hope you would avoid. hope i clarified this.

you might want to support the practice of widow defacement, and please provide your rationale for it. this is an open forum for discussing ideas, i hope and not individual persons, on your assumptions of what i am (in canada). oh no.you are a canadian.made a living there,got converted to mental thinking of canadians majority aka christanity.widows in our society are treated with respect.just becoz some rubbish happened 50 years back,is no reason for you to start reprimanding our ancestors.

you may notice, that i never post comment on persons as a rule, (always exceptions) but usually only complements. on ideas, my views are all across according to my views.

in this instance my views are clear on this practice. your post has no bearing to what i said. instead you go on about, canada etc. all of which are not true, irrelevant and quite out of tune to your many erudit comments. how come?

thank you. kunjuppu,widow is a status.she cud very well remarry.or she can live her life as she wants.today women are educated,economically independent,dont give a rats ass to a man or his custom or traditions.the game has changed now.so,this 60 years back incidents have no relevance at all in india today.

thirumangalyam,is a symbol of married life.not only acts as a protection to her ownself but also to other men,who would otherwise lust after her.

06-08-2010, 02:29 AM	#14
beriarele Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 333 Senior Member	kunjuppu nachi, i would rather you comment on the practice, which have strong views on, and my post was confined to. its your past ideas,i am confronting.not you as a person.now i dont know,if we can seperate the two? you are attacking me person, which i hope you would avoid. hope i clarified this. you might want to support the practice of widow defacement, and please provide your rationale for it. this is an open forum for discussing ideas, i hope and not individual persons, on your assumptions of what i am (in canada). oh no.you are a canadian.made a living there,got converted to mental thinking of canadians majority aka christanity.widows in our society are treated with respect.just becoz some rubbish happened 50 years back,is no reason for you to start reprimanding our ancestors. you may notice, that i never post comment on persons as a rule, (always exceptions) but usually only complements. on ideas, my views are all across according to my views. in this instance my views are clear on this practice. your post has no bearing to what i said. instead you go on about, canada etc. all of which are not true, irrelevant and quite out of tune to your many erudit comments. how come? thank you. kunjuppu,widow is a status.she cud very well remarry.or she can live her life as she wants.today women are educated,economically independent,dont give a rats ass to a man or his custom or traditions.the game has changed now.so,this 60 years back incidents have no relevance at all in india today. thirumangalyam,is a symbol of married life.not only acts as a protection to her ownself but also to other men,who would otherwise lust after her.
	Quote