Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#21 |
|
Many half Horner half European mixes don't look like that kid; instead, they look North African.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that North Africans are half East African, and I'm not denying that you have lots of Eurasian ancestry. But autosomal studies, as well as your very own subclade of E3b (E-M81) show the African genetic contributions to North African populations. |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
|
' |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
|
Horners are mixed.period. Tishkoff studied Mozabites (Saharans) and she argues that Mozabites are more than 60% of her "European" cluster , then I assume Kabylians and other north Algerians would reach the 90%. |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
|
Stupid. E1b1b lineage came from an ancient Eurasian lineage which enter Africa and spread through Northeast Egypt and East-Africa , then to North Africa (a long with a very-well known J1 lineage , found all over North Africa). The presence of Humans in Northwest Africa is caracterized by an Ibero-maurisian culture (surely U6 MTDNA). Where do you see any Horners here ? E1b1a entered Africa , from Eurasia , way before and colonized much of Africa over A and B hg (Khoisan/Pygmies) , E1b1b is a descendant of E1 , descendants of E coming from DE via CT (migrations of Humans out of Africa). |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
|
Stupid. E1b1b lineage came from an ancient Eurasian lineage which enter Africa and spread through Northeast Egypt and East-Africa , then to North Africa (a long with a very-well known J1 lineage , found all over North Africa). The presence of Humans in Northwest Africa is caracterized by an Ibero-maurisian culture (surely U6 MTDNA). Where do you see any Horners here ? E1b1a entered Africa , from Eurasia , way before and colonized much of Africa over A and B hg (Khoisan/Pygmies) , E1b1b is a descendant of E1 , descendants of E coming from DE via CT (migrations of Humans out of Africa). Any sources to your claims... |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
|
It would be sweet if someone posted a thread comparing Horner/European individuals with West African/European individuals. Comletely untrue. Horners are mixed , so when they mix with Eurasian , the level of Eurasian ancestry increases and they tend to look more North African/Middle-East than do pure Horners. |
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
|
Now you Euro-centrists are claiming the most quintessential African marker 'E' as being Eurasian, wow, what's next? DE comes from CT , which is the marker that represents the migration of Humans outside of Africa and actually CR gave birth to C haplogroup , F haplogroup ( all its descandants) and DE. ( whereas A and B hg staid in Africa). E1b1b re-entered Africa by Eurasian migrations (caracterized also by a J1 lineage and Eurasian MTDNA such as M1 and such others). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Yhaplotree.JPG |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
|
That wouldn't prove anything, people of true 50-50 mixes can have phenotypes that go either way. You remember Gelaye? He had an interesting look. |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
|
Perhaps in the USA where African-Americans have significant European ancestry and even then very few come out looking anything close to that kid or some other Horner/European people I've seen. They certainly don't look North African. But I haven't seen many to be honest. So a thread o nit would be super cool. |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
|
Anyone with common sense could deduce its origin by simply analyzing this map
http://www.thegeneticatlas.com/E.png |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
|
You're wrong, Qart Hadash. It doesn't matter where E* originated, E1b1a and E1b1b are believed to have originated in Sub-Saharan Africa. |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
|
If E originated is Eurasia like that troll stated why don't Bantus cluster with Eurasians in Tishkoff's study? By his logic Bantus expanded recently from Eurasia, leapfrogged into southern Nigeria/northern Cameroon and spread through central, eastern and southern africa, all of this while populating West Africa. But you should understand that even if E originated outside of Africa, it could still have been spread by males who are genetically no different to African males. That's the way haplogroups work. |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
|
If E originated is Eurasia like that troll stated why don't Bantus cluster with Eurasians in Tishkoff's study? By his logic Bantus expanded recently from Eurasia, leapfrogged into southern Nigeria/northern Cameroon and spread through central, eastern and southern africa, all of this while populating West Africa. ---------- Post added 2010-05-23 at 22:05 ---------- Hey, those aren't my words. It doesn't make any sense to me either. I don't think he's a troll, I think we should just leave him be. ---------- Post added 2010-05-23 at 22:22 ---------- You're wrong, Qart Hadash. It doesn't matter where E* originated, E1b1a and E1b1b are believed to have originated in Sub-Saharan Africa. |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
|
Bantu's expansion was made into West , South and Cental Africa , many ethnicites in Africa still carry A and B haplogroups , while others (mostly Bantus) carry E1b1a , DE was detected as far as Tibet , and actually , D is common among ethnicities such as Japanese (including Ainus). ---------- Post added 2010-05-23 at 22:22 ---------- An anthropologist named Mathida , argued that E3b and J1 developped in an area from Northeast Egypt/Nubia to Levant , and then spread into North Africa (Neolothic migrations) , Europe (into Balkans) , Arabia (North-to-South migrations) and East-Africa (South migrations). Just look at where J1 appears to be high (Yemen) , it actually shows how much E3b/J1 spread themselves and how they spread archaic Afro-Asiatic languages. "An anthropologist named Mathilda"? Who is this person? E-M78 could have originated in Upper Egypt/Nubia, that is correct. E-M35, however (E1b1b*), is the most diverse in East Africa and is the haplogroup which is associated with the spread of Afro-Asiatic languages. Some subclades of this haplogroup are found in Eastern Africa south of the Horn of Africa, in Afro-Asiatic speaking populations without a trace of J. |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
|
E-M78 could have originated in Upper Egypt/Nubia, that is correct. E-M35, however (E1b1b*), is the most diverse in East Africa and is the haplogroup which is associated with the spread of Afro-Asiatic languages. Some subclades of this haplogroup are found in Eastern Africa south of the Horn of Africa, in Afro-Asiatic speaking populations without a trace of J. Contradictory. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|