Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
Certainly not Western Europe, which has turned into an emasculated fag paradise. Also, when did this emasculation start? I believe it is a recent development, which has come about in the mid 2000s, because I remember coming to the end of my school days back in the early 2000s, and faggots were definately not accepted, we made fun of them and made their lives hell. I can't imagine that being tolerated in schools in 2010.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
Certainly not Western Europe, which has turned into an emasculated fag paradise. Also, when did this emasculation start? I believe it is a recent development, which has come about in the mid 2000s, because I remember coming to the end of my school days back in the early 2000s, and faggots we definately not accepted, people made fun of them and made their lives hell. I can't imagine that being tolerated in schools in 2010. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
Central Africa. Even their women are masculine. And for good reason. A lot of them are circumcised. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
Certainly not Western Europe, which has turned into an emasculated fag paradise. Also, when did this emasculation start? I believe it is a recent development, which has come about in the mid 2000s, because I remember coming to the end of my school days back in the early 2000s, and faggots were definately not accepted, we made fun of them and made their lives hell. I can't imagine that being tolerated in schools in 2010. Most feminine looking would be east/south east asians, and siberians. When it comes to NEGROIDS, they do have slightly more testosterone, but only in the younger ages, not in the older ages. However negroids DONT look very masculine, in fact pure ones look very childish. Caucasoids and australoids have the most masculine features. |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
In terms of phenotype, i dont think there is really anything more masculine than the Iranid type
Massive beard, prominent nose, large eyes, elongated face, sharp/offensive features I dont think i personally have this particular type but its fairly common in Iran/Afghanistan and it appears to be a rather common phenotype among my mom's side of the family where it also features very tall stature |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
In Finland, Sweden, Canada etc. hunting and shooting wild animals is considered macho. Yeah. Any gay can go out with a comfortable jeep and shooting a moose behind a bush without taking any risk of danger. That is illegal at Finland and at Sweden too. |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
In terms of phenotype, i dont think there is really anything more masculine than the Iranid type http://img481.imageshack.us/i/bizikge7.jpg/ ---------- Post added 2010-09-11 at 04:55 ---------- I personally don't think many Africans look that masculine in physical traits, many have receeding chins, and rather rounded, chubby faces. Look at this baby faced defensive lineman: http://www.jamati.com/online/sports/...defensive-end/ He's supposedly not masculine according to you |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
This type? Just add a massive beard I think Taliban-oid is the best match for the type I had in mind http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/ph...14/taliban.jpg |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
Certainly not Western Europe, which has turned into an emasculated fag paradise. Also, when did this emasculation start? I believe it is a recent development, which has come about in the mid 2000s, because I remember coming to the end of my school days back in the early 2000s, and faggots were definately not accepted, we made fun of them and made their lives hell. I can't imagine that being tolerated in schools in 2010. |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (0 members and 3 guests) | |
|