[Keyblctt]

Who is this guy? Is he a notorious racist or something? He sure doesn't look like he'd fit the bill - ofcourse you can't judge a book by its cover though.

The article says he was a Klu Klux Klan leader. I didn't even know that existed anymore.

[gastabegree]

I'm entirely convinced that someone of a different type beating a racist would make the latter less racist...

[Nekas48]

Yes, he is the founder of Stormfront.

---------- Post added 2011-12-01 at 18:03 ----------

I'm entirely convinced that someone of a different type beating a racist would make the latter less racist...

well, he will do it because the man offended him with his speech, and as part of the freedom of speech, he made himself very felt with the fist, remeber that it is freedom of speech so we won't go to jail for hitting a person who offended him.

[zabiqapara]

Yes, he is the founder of Stormfront.

---------- Post added 2011-12-01 at 18:03 ----------

well, he will do it because the man offended him with his speech, and as part of the freedom of speech, he made himself very felt with the fist, remeber that it is freedom of speech so we won't go to jail for hitting a person who offended him.

I'll be sure to remember that next time someone offends me.

And when I get arrested I'll just tell them that jibarodepr said it was alright. :P

[Poeetiol]

I'll be sure to remember that next time someone offends me.

And when I get arrested I'll just tell them that jibarodepr said it was alright. :P

I wouldn't hit anyone, but if you are speaking of freedom of speech, you know that the person you offend if on the right of also use his freedom of speech too.But if would be better to the person insulting not to insult.

[LillyPlay]

I wouldn't hit anyone, but if you are speaking of freedom of speech, you know that the person you offend if on the right of also use his freedom of speech too.But if would be better to the person insulting not to insult.

I think the only people who resort to violence because of words are people incapable of expressing themselves properly with words. At any rate, I don't think Freedom of Speech legally covers punching someone.

[EbrsaRynleot]

I think the only people who resort to violence because of words are people incapable of expressing themselves properly with words. At any rate, I don't think Freedom of Speech legally covers punching someone.

Some people an, other don't, not all people are equal, the person saying the speech must know there are cosequences for it, if I spit someone in the face, there will be consequences for it, also this type of people will not undertsand anyone a person say, on the case of duke, is the person is non-white, he won't listen to the person, but isntead start provolking the person and looking at the person as less than human.

[pXss8cyx]

Some people an, other don't, not all people are equal, the person saying the speech must know there are cosequences for it, if I spit someone in the face, there will be consequences for it, also this type of people will not undertsand anyone a person say, on the case of duke, is the person is non-white, he won't listen to the person, but isntead start provolking the person and looking at the person as less than human.

Dude, I really don't think that spitting in someones face is covered either. If I spit in someones face I would fully expect some sort of physical reaction.

[DoctorDulitlBest]

Dude, I really don't think that spitting in someones face is covered either. If I spit in someones face I would fully expect some sort of physical reaction.

There are people who it is just better to stay away from, David Duke is a person one should better stay away to avoid conflict.

[anxpuna]

Duh, Germany has restrictions on freedom of speech about anything to do with the Jewish holocaust, and he is a major holocaust denier. Surely he knew this would happen and went there to get publicity.

As far as I know he has never "denied the holocaust", he has however called for freedom of speech on the issue, like there is freedom of speech on all other historical issues. But maybe even just the act itself of calling for civil rights on the issue of the Holocaust is also now illegal in Germany?

[VonErmad4]

Holocaust denial et al, a crime in Germany

If he didn't deny the holocaust in Germany, I don't think they have any legal grounds to charge him with anything.

If he did, then he is a fool.

The article says he was a Klu Klux Klan leader. I didn't even know that existed anymore.

He was a leader of A Ku Klux Klan. THE KKK no longer exists. In order to protect themselves from legal trouble, they decentralized into dozens of independent little klans. Several lawsuits have led to klans losing millions of dollars, or worse, being handed by courts over to black people.

Yes, he is the founder of Stormfront.

Not quite. As a former Stormfronter, I shall correct the situation:

Duke's ex-wife Chloe was a co-founder of Stormfront with her second husband Don Black, who was a disciple of Duke's in the Knights of the KKK. Duke's wife left him after he cheated on her, and wound up with Black, his right-hand man. They reconciled, to an extent, and there are now ties between Stormfront and Duke, but he had nothing to do with its creation directly.

[sisuarmalmicy]

Democracy is so beautiful, so peaceful & real freedom of speech!

[Aswdwdfg]

Holocaust denial et al, a crime in Germany

Is it also a crime to deny communist atrocities?

[9uWzBx4l]

he isn't better than this black panther both should share the same cell

[raspirator]

he isn't better than this black panther both should share the same cell

"I hate white people. All of them. Every last iota of a cracker, I hate them."


"You want freedom your going to have to kill some crackers. Your going have to kill some of their babies."





Does David Duke say this same shit?

[DeilMikina]

Is it also a crime to deny communist atrocities?

No.

It is a crime to use the Nazi flag for anything other than historical purposes, and it is a crime to deny the holocaust. Soviet flag is legal, Soviet crime denial is legal.

[Theorsell]

No.

It is a crime to use the Nazi flag for anything other than historical purposes, and it is a crime to deny the holocaust. Soviet flag is legal, Soviet crime denial is legal.

Do you personally think it is a crime? Do you support the national socialist flag being banned without a historical purpose?

[maxuilg]

I was responding to that moron above when he asked what Duke was arrested for.

I don't see why you have to call me a moron. I didn't feel like reading the whole article.

It is a crime to use the Nazi flag for anything other than historical purposes, and it is a crime to deny the holocaust. Soviet flag is legal, Soviet crime denial is legal.

Communists are responsible for way more deaths than National Socialists. But Communists aren't considered as bad since they oppose "racism" and many of them are Jewish.

A few years ago, there was a law drafted in the Ukraine to make Holodomor denial illegal. I don't know if it passed though.

[clomoll]

lol isn't this ironic though, him being arrested in Germany?

[Dreaming]

Do you personally think it is a crime? Do you support the national socialist flag being banned without a historical purpose?

Of course not. I believe in freedom of speech and expression.

Once you criminalize thoughts, you can criminalize anything.