Reply to Thread New Thread |
11-16-2011, 09:38 PM | #21 |
|
|
|
11-16-2011, 09:40 PM | #22 |
|
The horseshoe arch (arco de herradura), very used in Islamic art, also in Magreb, is roman, not arab or berber. anyway moorish art looks nothing like "christian" art different ethnic groups have different tastes and crate different arts in my opinion the average spaniard wouldn't find it beautiful(many colors and forms) it would be too "cantoso" for them |
|
11-16-2011, 09:54 PM | #23 |
|
yeah but it isn't very used by Castillians And the andalusi art is heavily influenced by byzantine and roman-visigothic art, for the construction of Córdoba Mosque were used roman and visigoth columns and mosaics were made by byzantine artists... |
|
11-16-2011, 09:58 PM | #25 |
|
The horseshoe arch is very common in visigothic art, most churches use it. well If you look at any christian monument in Spain and most islamic monuments in Spain you'll notice that they were made by very different people they look like day and night Romans,Visigoths,Greeks,Byzantines and Mesopotamians gave alot of influences to most of the known world so it's not surprising if they use and if they took some old visigoth buildings and converted them into moorish places and mosques the same the Catholics kings did to moorish monuments that means nothing also moorish architecture is more similar to Maghrebian architecture than Near Eastern architecture...anyway moorish is too "barroco" for the Spanish mentality to crate it,moors are more barrocos and that type of art suits them best just look at the Spanish woman and the Maghrebi woman ,maghrebi clothes are way more outrageous than the Spanish clothes very different tastes Spaniards would find Maghrebi clothes "recargados" and Maghrebis would find Spanish clothes very borring |
|
11-16-2011, 10:12 PM | #26 |
|
|
|
11-16-2011, 10:27 PM | #28 |
|
Byzantines were mostly Near Easterns right??? Moors and Christians were largely the same origin, but with a different religion and culture, they were not radically different peoples. |
|
11-16-2011, 10:42 PM | #29 |
|
Most moors were natives that converted to Islam to avoid paying the taxes that the islamic rulers required the christians to pay. Many islamic rulers were in fact visigoths converted to islam that changed their names to arabic.
For example: Abû l-Walîd Hishâm ibn al-Hakam was a redhead. His mother was a visigothic Spaniard. There are also some califas that in fact were pure visigothic converted to islam, and changed their name and surname to arabic. We don´t have to invent theories, we just have to see drawings of that era. This one was painted in the Alhambra. It represents muslims kings of Granada: The muslims entered Spain as a result of a betrayal among visigothic rulers. |
|
11-16-2011, 10:44 PM | #30 |
|
anyway aren't there like some moorish cementeries??? |
|
11-17-2011, 02:10 AM | #31 |
|
First, and prior to the muslim arrival, were those form Mauretania Tingitana (mauri=moor) who invaded Spain during the Roman Empire times. 1. The ones who came during the Roman era, were they the ones who allied with Hannibal (Numidians)? Mauretania always confuses me (historicaly vs modern Mauretania and the people called as such). 2. During the period after the fall of the Roman Empire, what was the ethnic makeupe of Spain? Were they Romanized CeltIberian, Celts and Iberian proper and some of the Germanic tribes? Were those the HispanoRomans? So who were the invaders greatest foes, Visigoths, Vandals, Suebi, etc.? |
|
11-17-2011, 02:20 AM | #32 |
|
The slavic were the "saqaliba", right? And that proves Slavic peoples invaded Spain in 711. ---------- Post added 2011-11-16 at 19:22 ---------- In my city -Zaragoza- there were berbers, confirmed by archaeology and toponyms. There is a neighbourhood outside the city wich was inhabited since X century. Its name, Monzalbarba (Manzil Barbar), explains its ethnical origin. ---------- Post added 2011-11-16 at 19:23 ---------- anyway the important moors were berber because moorish architecture resembles Maghreb's architecture and that type of architecture looks nothing like pre-al-andalus iberian architecture because that type of art can't come from the mind of a western European My ass!!! And flamenco music is from Arabia... And there were Arabic horses... And Arabs went to Spain to invent irrigation... And many more fairy tales. |
|
11-17-2011, 07:47 AM | #34 |
|
|
|
11-17-2011, 07:50 AM | #35 |
|
|
|
11-17-2011, 10:07 PM | #36 |
|
|
|
11-17-2011, 10:32 PM | #37 |
|
|
|
11-17-2011, 10:51 PM | #38 |
|
Yep It's raining everywhere even in the Extremadurian desert lol (it's actually getting greeny). Well neolithic or not there's always been a second component around. Care to explain how I am 25% MENA? Inquisition changed the demographics of Spain? So many things to which I dont know the answers to...
|
|
11-17-2011, 11:07 PM | #39 |
|
Yep It's raining everywhere even in the Extremadurian desert lol (it's actually getting greeny). Well neolithic or not there's always been a second component around. Care to explain how I am 25% MENA? Inquisition changed the demographics of Spain? So many things to which I dont know the answers to... |
|
11-17-2011, 11:10 PM | #40 |
|
Question (and for anyone else who can shed some light): Efectivamente, durante el reinado de Marco Aurelio en el siglo II de nuestra era (en la década de los setenta) hubo un par de invasiones de pueblos "mauri" (nombre dado a los habitantes de Tingitania y término del que procede el actual "moro"). Se trataba de un conjunto de pueblos de raÃ*z bereber, que habrÃ*an aprovechado la debilidad de Roma -y la proximidad de una zona tan rica como el valle del Guadalquivir- para emprender acciones de rapiña. Los mauri se establecÃ*an en este momento en las montañas del Rif, cercanas al Estrecho de Gibraltar, lo que les permitió fácilmente invadir la provincia romana de la Bética en el sur de la PenÃ*nsula. Los mauri fueron altamente apreciados por los romanos como soldados, especialmente como caballerÃ*a ligera. La influencia romana estaba confinada sobre todo a la costa, y Roma gobernó el interior a través de caudillos mauri locales. La escasa y tardÃ*a romanización y su caracter nómada, unido a los problemas del imperio, hicieron posible estas incursiones. Es cierto que Roma no se encontraba en su mejor momento en la provincia tingitana, sin embargo, no hay documentación concreta que permita hablar de que en la época se produjera una sublevación. Por otra parte, no parece verosÃ*mil que los autores de los ataques contra la Bética fueran poblaciones del interior, de unas tierras alejadas del mar. Por el contrario, parece que los atacantes de la Bética debieron ser poblaciones de la zona costera, asÃ* pues, parece más lógico que los ataques contra Hispania se atribuyan a las poblaciones rifeñas. Los estudios que se han hecho de las circunstancias indican que este ataque de los moros se efectuó entre el 169 y el 172, e incluso podrÃ*a precisarse más en torno al año 171. http://ejercito-romano.losforos.es/l...-d-c-t105.html 2-All the prerroman latinized hispani + a few families of imperial origin (mainly italic) + some immigrants from other provinces. The germanic peoples weren't hispanorromani, there was in fact a kind of segregation between the rulers and the "native" stock. Those were: Alani (of iranic origin), who weren't a grat number, settled in the central fringe of Spain (from the Atlantic to the Mediterreanean) Vandali asdingi in Callaecia and Asturica, Vandali silingi in Baetica (more or less Andalusia) Suevi in northwestern Spain Visigothi, the more important, who drove alani and vandali out (to north Africa) and absorbed the suevi. The total amount of the visigothi was around 200.000 individuals (they came with their clients form other tribes and provinces, including gallo-romans) |
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 38 (0 members and 38 guests) | |
|