Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#21 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
|
Slavia we are adhering to the prescribed descriptors above which, if you have had the time to notice, are generalizations. Save the insult. ![]() ---------- Post added 2011-05-11 at 19:09 ---------- Not really, most central europeans have lighter skin tone in average than southern europeans. Its the other way around, most central europeans dont differ much in skin tone from northern europeans. ![]() ![]() ---------- Post added 2011-05-11 at 19:19 ---------- It's because you live in a country where blond men are rare or uncommon, thats why u appreaciate them. I have never heard/met a girl from a predominantly fair country being focused in blond men. In Eastern Europe girls go crazy for Sergei Lazarev, Rafael Sobis, Artur Boruc types. Unless you're going to claim blonds are rare here? |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
|
As a chick (albeit a kinda old one), I can offer something on this. I love men, generally. All of them! As far as appearance and type goes, somehow, I am psychologically attracted to redheaded, freckled men. It is really deep and I can't explain it, but I find them so incredibly hot. Next would be Indians (India Indians) like the guy that plays Mohinder Suresh on Heroes. Next would be the Mediterranian type, I guess. I almost married one. But then, I ended up marrying a dark blonde, green eyed white guy, and I think he is perfect too. Well, I hope I don't sound like a giggly girl. But truly, I like them all
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
|
Slavs and Southern Euros kick ass. End of story. Don't even try to argue with this ![]() ![]() kirilenko_andrei_1.jpg |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
|
Next would be Indians (India Indians) like the guy that plays Mohinder Suresh on Heroes. ![]() I guess its quiet well known that indians have that combination of having dark skin with very fine features going hand-in-hand. http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_WMh-KV-bVE...wnsoldier1.jpg |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
|
The only glaring error I see in the list is that latino men are definitely better-looking than middle easterners.....c'mon ladies-am I right?? |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
|
Not really, your first glance wasnt accurate, it says middle eastern over latino men, but arab men under latino men. With arab they mean saudis, yemenis and those types in contrast to middle eastern which mean more near eastern types such as lebanese or israeli men. In the other hand the text explain later that latino men with predominantly southern european heritage, such as argentinean, uruguayan and so on..fall just between western men (whites with medium features from britain/Ireland and anglosphere) and the near eastern men. All I know is that I'm solidly in the top group. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
|
I think who's most attractive depends entirely on where you live. For me i like all, and believe anyone of any ethnic group has a chance of being good looking. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but I would say that Northern euros/Germanics are the most aesthetically beautiful imo. Mainly because the features are sometimes striking espeacialy in a room full of darker people.
I think the modeling industry knows this too, they often pick models even of other ethnic groups with these prominent Germanic type features. I love darker women, they're smokin' hot but sometimes when i see that one Northern euro its like BADAM SHAZOW PADOW GUUUURDOOSH. Now that i think about it......all my crushes since ive been a kid have been mostly Germanic. Basicaly you seen some of those 80's/90's movies where you see that hot blonde walking all slow and a song plays like "I WANNA KNOW WHAT LOVE IS". Only they could pull that off. I still love my brunettes, don't get me wrong. |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
|
So, they ARE better-looking than middle easterners--don't know how you score that as wrong, but it doesn't matter. |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
|
Slavs????...err???... sure mate.... |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
|
So, they ARE better-looking than middle easterners--don't know how you score that as wrong, but it doesn't matter. ![]() The Latinos mentioned there were all Indios. ---------- Post added 2011-05-14 at 01:42 ---------- So, they ARE better-looking than middle easterners--don't know how you score that as wrong, but it doesn't matter. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
|
You think Middle Easterners look worse than Amerindian types? |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
|
You didnt get it... It actually meant that he didnt understand why Middle eastern looked worse than latinos, but who actually scored lower than latinos were middle eastern(near eastern types) but rather arabs like yemeni, saudi arabian and egyptians, osama bin laden types, not your pseudo mediterranean looking lebanese or israeli. |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
|
I know, but I was commenting on what he said. He was saying that Latinos, from those countries, look better than Middle Easterners. I think even Yemenis look better than Bolivians. ![]() Btw i got it wrong aswell, i read again the post from Getho Thracian, and all he meant was , why Latinos were under Middle eastern men (Lebanese, Turks, Iranian) and not over them. |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
|
I know, but I was commenting on what he said. He was saying that Latinos, from those countries, look better than Middle Easterners. I think even Yemenis look better than Bolivians. ![]() ---------- Post added 2011-05-14 at 01:01 ---------- Are we actually going to go there? |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 4 (0 members and 4 guests) | |
|