Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#21 |
|
I'm on my phone typing from an airport so I dont really have the typing ability to flesh out my arguments here, but semetic duea I've never heard of a single orthodox rabbi who will accept someone as a Jew based on patrelinial descent. I was pointing out the fact that you softly push aside the patrilineal line as irrelevant, which; if anything, is a gross simplification of status determination b'Yahadut (the father defining the tribal heritage, this is why a patrilineal will never get called a "stranger" in Israel, a "goy" perhaps; but not a stranger.... The same cannot be said for matrilineals I'm afraid. [also keep in mind that I'm a Kohen, even 7aredim won't dare to call me "goy"; only brainless/ignorant non-hackers will.]) In fact the opposite, I heard of a girl who was asked to leave a seminary in israel when she mentioned her mother wasn't Jewish. Very sad IMO. That's nothing compared to rabbanut's ordeal with patrilineals: We don't get the right to marry (ever wondered why so many Israelis celebrate their unions in Cyrpus?!), to be buried in Jewish cemetaries and to live in kibbutzim or yishuv. We also get the "no religion" brand on our ID cards. I've also never heard of converts being treated differently. In the eyes of Halacha they're as any born Jew and to treat them badly is a serious sin. Doesn't the Torah talk about being kind to the stranger and convert amongst you? Yes, for we were gerim b'mitzrayim, though the Talmud often contradicts this statement (as it often does for many other TaNa5ic statements as a mater of fact). Anyways if a convert gets treated differently that's just someone being an asshole, not emblematic of Jews at large. I know a few converts and they've never had any issues. That's where I beg to differ: Harabbanut keeps lists of mamzerim in Israel. Converts also qualify for these lists as they can only marry mamzerim and other converts. (The nonsense goes so far nowadays that even full Jews have to prove their Jewishness to rabbani authorities: http://www.irac.org/NewsDetailes.aspx?ID=715) |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
|
I also heard that the reason why you're a Jew if your mother is a Jew is because back in the day (When there was no genetic tests), they knew 100% who your mother was since you come out of her, but with your father it's an assumption that he is the father, one can never be 100% sure with the paternal side. Me personally? I think Judaism is more of a religion than an ethnic group, not that there are no real Jews out there, but the fact that you allow people of total different heritage to convert and become Jews right off the bat allows the gene pool to be mixed, which makes the definition of ethnic group rather difficult, you also cannot say that these people are never Jewish because the reality is, those who convert and actually live up to it become real Jews and start marrying Jews, which they pass their genes to the real Jews. Judaism is a religion. But being Jewish is more ambiguous/complex. |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
|
That could possibly be an explanation. I've heard/read that Jews began passing on their ancestry via the mother because many Jewish women were being taken/married off to non-Jews. What about the temporary law which classified matrilineals as certified mamzerim (a law which was partly abrogated)? Doesn't make any sense imo. Passing the ancestry down maternally allowed the community to claim the offspring that were produced outside of the community. Pretty clever decision, helped community attain access to power/resources/etc; Jewish woman marries a King... offspring (princes/princesses) are still seen as Jewish. And since the rest of the world recognizes paternal ancestry, the offspring are still believed to be their father's descendants. Same goes for Jewish males; they marry a non-Jew and the rest of the world (including Jews) would still sees them as Jews. In definitive, you all fail to address Yahadut's diversity. Don't we Qara2im qualify as Yehudim (some rabbanim would jump on the table and scream but nvm, as long as they use our canonical classification in liturgy, afra lefumĂȘ ![]() But you'd rather stay clutched to your monolithic view, so I won't bother you any further in your delirium ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
|
Nonsense once more, if such a thing was true, then why keep the Kohen and Levite castes? |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
|
You fool... I'm referring to the origins of the practice. After all, Josephus does state that P'ruĆĄim were pro-roman and as such, this hypothesis of mine becomes plausible. What Rabbis/Jews/etc do today is a different story. What rabbanim do today is irrelevant to the "origins of the practice", so your outburst looks rather odd ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
|
That could possibly be an explanation. I've heard/read that Jews began passing on their ancestry via the mother because many Jewish women were being taken/married off to non-Jews. Passing the ancestry down maternally allowed the community to claim the offspring that were produced outside of the community. Pretty clever decision, helped community attain access to power/resources/etc; Jewish woman marries a King... offspring (princes/princesses) are still seen as Jewish. And since the rest of the world recognizes paternal ancestry, the offspring are still believed to be their father's descendants. Same goes for Jewish males; they marry a non-Jew and the rest of the world (including Jews) would still sees them as Jews. Judaism is a religion. But being Jewish is more ambiguous/complex. I guess stateless nomadic people are supposably also thought to have an ambiguous ethnicity. This is a shame. I think genetics, geneaology, ancestral languages, customs, culture, cuisine should be enough to rate you as either belonging (or partially) to an ethnic group. National borders aren't everything. You might be American and Nigerian, but you still have a right to affiliate with being Igbo and for many, i know this may seem just as important. |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
|
When it comes to genetics, it couldn't care less what line you are Jewish on, whether maternal or paternal, if you are N European or NW European with Ashkenazi or East Sephardi Jewish, theres a well above 90% chance you will cluster with Italians. |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
|
Moshe married before the Torah was given so technically there couldn't have been any issue of descent since there were no Jews yet. Or am I just being pendatic? Another thought for Re7av3am, Ć*'lomo's son and king of Mal5ut Yehudah ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
|
Well in that sense, if we throw genetics out I guess Judaism can be considered as a culture, this culture can create the ethnicity over time if the group remains to itself without a lot of mixing. Is there anyway in which being Assyrian is a more valid ethnicity than say a sub-Jewish ethnicity? I would like to know, because i personally see both as legit ethnicities frankly. |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
|
I'm patrilinearly Sephardi , I like alot the people from the community , especially in France , they are one of the most productive ethnic group , I've even seen an important agence with my own family name. They suffered alot through history (many people usually forget that) but were always standing up , that is what I most admire. people should stop with prejudices btw :/
|
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
|
Is there anyway in which being Assyrian is a more valid ethnicity than say a sub-Jewish ethnicity? I would like to know, because i personally see both as legit ethnicities frankly. The biggest differences within Assyrian communities you'll find is with the Church they follow and the dialect they speak, but as far as culture and language it's all the same, with Jews it seems like not only are there different sects, there are very different communities when it comes to language and culture too, you have Ashkenazi, Sephardi, and Mizrahi being the biggest divisions, along with other minor ones, all these differ from one another greatly when it comes to language and culture. I'll give you a good example, a Kurdish Jew is probably a lot closer to an Assyrian when it comes to looks, language, and culture, but only differs in religion, how do you define this Jew's ethnic background? Mind you, I agree that the Jews do have a valid claim to be an ethnic group, I just think the diaspora has made these major divisions with them and if you look at our Assyrian people, we will likely follow the same path, obviously it does not show now since we have not been in the diaspora for that long, the oldest Assyrian diaspora lives in Russia/Ukraine and it's not even 300 years old, so go figure. |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
|
it all really depends because someone who converted to judaism and practices the jewish faith to me is more jewish than i am because although my father is jewish.. i dont practice judaism at all and follow the christian faith. |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
|
That's not true. The converted will be religiously , however , if you're dad is Sephardi/Mizrahi , then you'll still be more "jewish" than he is in an ethnically way (but also religiously through you're grandfather) , my dad is of Sephardi descent , and If I took a 23andme test It'll be easily noticeable , more so than a converted , even though I don't follow the religion at all. |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
|
well if you mean being jewish an a ethnic sense thats different but to me being a jew is following the religion and traditions of the tora. because really im not a jew.. by blood my ancestry can be traced to that region but in terms of religion and culture a convert to judaism has more right to be jewish that me. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 5 (0 members and 5 guests) | |
|