LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 12-05-2010, 12:30 AM   #21
Smabeabumjess

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
547
Senior Member
Default
another ethnocentric psedo intellectual....preety much the "norm" of this forum posting his or her nonsense
aint shit new
You're always whining instead of providing counter arguments. Your entire presence at this forum is a waste.
Smabeabumjess is offline


Old 12-05-2010, 12:51 AM   #22
Tauntenue

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
512
Senior Member
Default
People get into relationships for all sorts of reasons but I doubt a "race ladder" is one of those reasons. Under that insane theory, one person in the relationship would ALWAYS be acting against his or her "racial self-interest" (if that term exists). If you believe in a "race ladder" you would NEVER marry outside your race.
Tauntenue is offline


Old 12-05-2010, 12:56 AM   #23
sigrekatonov

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
410
Senior Member
Default
I already got married to a White European, thankyouverymuch.

---------- Post added 2010-12-03 at 23:28 ----------



Sorry dude, Whites only.

And I already covered the payment part in this post: http://www.forumbiodiversity.com/sho...&postcount=172



The topic is mainly: how do you please a White partner?
are you sure you a christian? Cuz no real christian have your racial superiority complex

regarding the topic a white girl is the easiest to please, I dated a half black half indian girl but she was also easy to please like white girls, latinas are way more difficult to please tho.
sigrekatonov is offline


Old 12-05-2010, 01:20 AM   #24
kesFockplek

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
642
Senior Member
Default
I think the question should be asked according to different intellectual context:


IQ test for the challenged: How to please white people.
(Only severely retarded people need to answer)


IQ test for the normal people: How to please average white people
(All normal people must answer)



IQ test for the gifted people: How to please retarded white people
(Gifted people must answer)



I consider myself as normal people, so my answer is: Treat them the way they treat me.
kesFockplek is offline


Old 12-05-2010, 01:47 AM   #25
KneefeZes

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
436
Senior Member
Default
Allright, allthough I'm "half Latina" (I mostly just feel white) I have to admit that my impression of Latinas is that they're very spoiled and materialistic, they're very demanding and consuming, and don't really realize when they got a good man.

I'm so gonna marry a Latino guy and save at least one of them from those parasiting Latinas!
KneefeZes is offline


Old 12-05-2010, 02:15 AM   #26
Imampaictjg

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
464
Senior Member
Default
You're always whining instead of providing counter arguments. Your entire presence at this forum is a waste.
why post counter evidence when the topic is meaningless just another rant...besides i don't have the time to type long paragraphs so i just give my 2 cents and click the submit button
by the way your posts are full of shit
Imampaictjg is offline


Old 12-05-2010, 02:23 AM   #27
mxzjxluwst

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
345
Senior Member
Default
Allright, allthough I'm "half Latina" (I mostly just feel white) I have to admit that my impression of Latinas is that they're very spoiled and materialistic, they're very demanding and consuming, and don't really realize when they got a good man.

I'm so gonna marry a Latino guy and save at least one of them from those parasiting Latinas!
The good thing about Latinas is that they "know their roles" as women/females, even though they maybe demanding. Unlike white women "trying to prove their equality and sameness" to men, Latinas feel no need to become more 'masculine'-like.

In that way, I'd much more prefer to date a Latina who is very demanding than a white girl who wants to "become a man", or at least, acts or pretends she is masculine or "equal to men". I believe in traditional gender roles and am rather anti-feminist.
mxzjxluwst is offline


Old 12-05-2010, 02:33 AM   #28
FUNALA

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
539
Senior Member
Default
The good thing about Latinas is that they "know their roles" as women/females, even though they maybe demanding. Unlike white women "trying to prove their equality and sameness" to men, Latinas feel no need to become more 'masculine'-like. In that way, I'd much more prefer to date a Latina who is very demanding than a white girl who wants to "become a man", or at least, acts or pretends she is masculine or "equal to men". I believe in traditional gender roles and am rather anti-feminist.
Personally I love being a woman and I'm very feminine, and gender roles kind of turns me on, but I don't consider being able to support yourself as "masculine", it just suck to be dependant on someone else than yourself. If I want something I get it, I don't need anyone to get it for me.
FUNALA is offline


Old 12-05-2010, 02:34 AM   #29
Roamsaffots

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
509
Senior Member
Default
why post counter evidence when the topic is meaningless just another rant...besides i don't have the time to type long paragraphs so i just give my 2 cents and click the submit button
by the way your posts are full of shit
The only posts I recall from you are the same: "I don't like this and I feel insulted; so screw you!" Why post at all if you have nothing constructive to say? You don't need to type long paragraphs to make an intelligent response.

I don't agree with Mary in this thread but if I cared enough to write a response I'd try to say something meaningful. Perhaps you should make an effort instead of wasting posts with your childish whining.
Roamsaffots is offline


Old 12-05-2010, 02:41 AM   #30
RozzyLiu

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
375
Senior Member
Default
Personally I love being a woman and I'm very feminine, and gender roles kind of turns me on, but I don't consider being able to support yourself as "masculine", it just suck to be dependant on someone else than yourself. If I want something I get it, I don't need anyone to get it for me.
Labor jobs were socialized in the 20th Century to meet increasing production demands.

They also hired children to work in factories like slaves, as they still do in 2nd and 3rd world countries; perhaps you agree with this as well???


I don't.

If children cannot or should not work hard-labor then why should women??


All that said, I really do not mind gender economic disparity. I just see it as bullshit.

Pretty soon in Amerika, women will start getting paid more for men for doing the same jobs. I'm pretty sure it's going to happen.
RozzyLiu is offline


Old 12-05-2010, 02:42 AM   #31
Kilsimpaile

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
495
Senior Member
Default
The only posts I recall from you are the same: "I don't like this and I feel insulted; so screw you!" Why post at all if you have nothing constructive to say? You don't need to type long paragraphs to make an intelligent response.

I don't agree with Mary in this thread but if I cared enough to write a response I'd try to say something meaningful. Perhaps you should make an effort instead of wasting posts with your childish whining.
LMAO
i can guarantee you that there is not 1 post i have on this forum where i said "screw" anybody...secondly a forum is the last place i will feel "insulted" at....so you just proved your very delusional none of what u said has any evidence

"Perhaps you should make an effort instead of wasting posts with your childish whining"
Well damn...how ironic is that? Your whole post was fool of childish whining...try not to contradict yourself next time if your gonna try to call someone out kiddo
Kilsimpaile is offline


Old 12-05-2010, 03:03 AM   #32
AromeWahmaron

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
345
Senior Member
Default
Labor jobs were socialized in the 20th Century to meet increasing production demands.

They also hired children to work in factories like slaves, as they still do in 2nd and 3rd world countries; perhaps you agree with this as well???


I don't.

If children cannot or should not work hard-labor then why should women??


All that said, I really do not mind gender economic disparity. I just see it as bullshit.

Pretty soon in Amerika, women will start getting paid more for men for doing the same jobs. I'm pretty sure it's going to happen.
where the hell did I mention I'm in favour of slavery work? You know there are regular jobs too?
AromeWahmaron is offline


Old 12-05-2010, 03:32 AM   #33
Buyemae

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
607
Senior Member
Default
where the hell did I mention I'm in favour of slavery work? You know there are regular jobs too?
My point was that women were not introduced to the job market, or seen as "equals", until after socioeconomic "progress" in the 20th Century. Jobs had always been relegated and regulated by social/traditional gender roles all times prior. Outside Amerika, people do not give gender roles in careers any second-glance. Europeans, for example, wouldn't ever think twice about a woman as a "policeman" or "fireman" or "lawyer" except that it doesn't make sense.

Why should a woman be a "policeman"?

When it comes to Latina v White females, Latinas feel no great 'need' or 'urge' to compete with men economically, socially, or politickally speaking. This is why I prefer them, because, they do not feel the need to compensate for what they're not.

If I want a woman for a relationship, I don't want my "equal". I want my "female-half" instead, a woman who can become a mother and tend to children. I don't want some woman faking-it by believing she can compete with me economically, socially, and politickally. This detracts from her becoming a mother, when she should be mothering a child.


I brought up the point of child hard labor because if women should work hard labor then so should children. I disbelieve both. I think neither women nor children should work hard labor, but men should, and will. However, many men have become lazy fucks in the world with no balls or passion to work. So yeah, I guess that does create a conundrum…
Buyemae is offline


Old 12-05-2010, 03:52 AM   #34
TheLucyLee

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
419
Senior Member
Default
So basically you prefer this kind of woman: "Sure I'll marry any sad fucker, just get me out of this shithole!"

I personally though prefer a relationship to be more than just a business deal, I don't really need a maid.
TheLucyLee is offline


Old 12-05-2010, 03:57 AM   #35
IoninnyHaro

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
377
Senior Member
Default
People get into relationships for all sorts of reasons but I doubt a "race ladder" is one of those reasons. Under that insane theory, one person in the relationship would ALWAYS be acting against his or her "racial self-interest" (if that term exists). If you believe in a "race ladder" you would NEVER marry outside your race.
I think race is one of the main reasons why people go outside their tribes for a mate. Black men chasing White women and Asian women chasing White men, are two common examples.

I agree that the basic is to keep your race. Many people do agree with that. The point of this type of "racial self interest" by keeping it within your race, is to stick to your place on the race ladder. At no point however does this school encourage going DOWN the race ladder. Like, if you're Asian your parents probably want you to marry an Asian. That is a common belief within Asian communities. Those Asian parents would NEVER approve of their kid marrying an Indian or a Black though. And lets be honest, even if they're strict on keeping it within their race, a White would be more accepted than a Black.

The reason why you would look to please a partner that is above you on the racial ladder is that you win out on climbing the ladder. You will not only have the White partner as your prize, but you will also be able to have White kids, thereby improving your race forever. Not only is pleasing a kind of payment, but it's also the morally right thing to do.

As a non-white, I find pleasing White people extremely difficult. So I'm trying to ask:

What do White men and women want from a non-white partner?

What do non-whites do to please their White (or racially superior) partners?
IoninnyHaro is offline


Old 12-05-2010, 03:59 AM   #36
surefireinvest

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
392
Senior Member
Default
If you want your wife to work while she's pregnant and for the first few years of infancy then I think you have major psychological issues/damages.

Women should not work who are mothering.


The problem is that too many people (men) want wives for frivolous sex and not creating families. I do not see the point of it. If a woman or man does not create a family then I think it is a great failure. Why shouldn't people do what they are born to do, and reproduce?

This problem is very deep though, and "spiritual" for most. Many people do not want to reproduce and that mentality is absurd compared to my own. So I'd rather not compare the two.

Point is: I will never want any woman to work while she is pregnant, nursing, and rearing a child to age 7. That is seven years of not working. That is impossible to do in Western Economics, which also not coincidentally, has destroyed all aspects and notions of any "traditional" marriage or family.

In the West, it's not a stretch of the imagination for a child to have 3 gay fathers, 2 lesbian mothers, a few surrogate parents, etc.

It's really quite perverse: it is "Neoliberalism" and becoming globalized.


In fact, it's not strange to see foreigners (mainly conservative Europeans) reject this quite adamantly throughout threads on ABF.

I promote more 'conservative' and 'traditional' world views.
surefireinvest is offline


Old 12-05-2010, 04:02 AM   #37
Cwvnyfsj

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
477
Senior Member
Default
are you sure you a christian? Cuz no real christian have your racial superiority complex

regarding the topic a white girl is the easiest to please, I dated a half black half indian girl but she was also easy to please like white girls, latinas are way more difficult to please tho.
I'm not a Christian with a "superiority complex". I am what is called a normal person.

Interesting that Latinas are considered so difficult. I had no idea. Whenever I've known a Latina who's had a White guy, she's always been really nice to him. Maybe they just kick harder down the ladder?
Cwvnyfsj is offline


Old 12-05-2010, 04:06 AM   #38
StitsVobsaith

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
537
Senior Member
Default
I think race is one of the main reasons why people go outside their tribes for a mate. Black men chasing White women and Asian women chasing White men, are two common examples.

I agree that the basic is to keep your race. Many people do agree with that. The point of this type of "racial self interest" by keeping it within your race, is to stick to your place on the race ladder. At no point however does this school encourage going DOWN the race ladder. Like, if you're Asian your parents probably want you to marry an Asian. That is a common belief within Asian communities. Those Asian parents would NEVER approve of their kid marrying an Indian or a Black though. And lets be honest, even if they're strict on keeping it within their race, a White would be more accepted than a Black.

The reason why you would look to please a partner that is above you on the racial ladder is that you win out on climbing the ladder. You will not only have the White partner as your prize, but you will also be able to have White kids, thereby improving your race forever. Not only is pleasing a kind of payment, but it's also the morally right thing to do.

As a non-white, I find pleasing White people extremely difficult. So I'm trying to ask:

What do White men and women want from a non-white partner?

What do non-whites do to please their White (or racially superior) partners?
How are whites racially superior please provide scientific facts? Btw I rarely see black men with white women is more like black men with hispanic women, you got it twisted
StitsVobsaith is offline


Old 12-05-2010, 04:11 AM   #39
inve.tment

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
475
Senior Member
Default
My point was that women were not introduced to the job market, or seen as "equals", until after socioeconomic "progress" in the 20th Century. Jobs had always been relegated and regulated by social/traditional gender roles all times prior. Outside Amerika, people do not give gender roles in careers any second-glance. Europeans, for example, wouldn't ever think twice about a woman as a "policeman" or "fireman" or "lawyer" except that it doesn't make sense.

Why should a woman be a "policeman"?
I agree a man is probably a better police and firefighter, since men in general are physically stronger, but why you think men would be better lawyers than women I have no idea. Women make great lawyers, even you should think so I mean I'm sure you agreeing on women having a manipulative nature At least that's a popular belief of male chauvinists.

When it comes to Latina v White females, Latinas feel no great 'need' or 'urge' to compete with men economically, socially, or politickally speaking. This is why I prefer them, because, they do not feel the need to compensate for what they're not.
I bet you feel threatened by women making more money than you, that's kinda weak, not very masculine you know...



If I want a woman for a relationship, I don't want my "equal". I want my "female-half" instead, a woman who can become a mother and tend to children. I don't want some woman faking-it by believing she can compete with me economically, socially, and politickally. This detracts from her becoming a mother, when she should be mothering a child.
Many women do it just because they can, and I'm sure that scares the shit out of your unmanly ass...
inve.tment is offline


Old 12-05-2010, 04:13 AM   #40
RichardFG435

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
424
Senior Member
Default
I agree that it is better for the child that the mother would stay at home during at least early childhood, but I still don't see why women should not be allowed to compete with men economically and politiCkally, if they so wish. Besides what's the problem if it really is so that women can't compete with you economically, socially, and politickally, they're no threat to you then: Let those daffy things have their fun with the big boys, when you and I know perfectly well that they will ultimately fail big time
RichardFG435 is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 25 (0 members and 25 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:34 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity