Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#21 |
|
The Germans were doing pretty well against multiple enemies until Hitler decided Aryans came with natural antifreeze in their systems. Also it's a bit bone-headed declaring war on the USA when you are already at war with both the Soviet Union and the British Empire. |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
|
The German army was technically and tactically brilliant but in stategy it was woeful compared to the Russians and Americans, partly due to Hitler's meddling especially in the Russian campaign. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
|
Definitely Finnish soldiers in WW2. Finland did not had any empire (unlike Sweden), and winter war was only within a few years. Soviet wasn't the most advanced anyway back then. And it was a defence-war from the finnish (with some helpe from swedes) side. Good soldiers are people who are in a nation that again and again both wins war and expand their territory and are feared by its neighbours and often all people of their continent. Otherwise best soldiers are those who can endure extreme conditions, weather/hunger/harsh environment. |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
|
Why are you guys argueing? It's obvious that Russians are the best soldiers. We owned Hitla, Napoleon, Teutonic Crusaders, Poles, Mongols and Finno-Ugrics. I think thats enought to wear a title of the best soldiers.
And look at the world map. How you think we got such a big terriotory? ![]() Definitely Finnish soldiers in WW2. So it does not count. Otherwise best soldiers are those who can endure extreme conditions, weather/hunger/harsh environment. Exactly! And it's we, Russians, again. |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
|
Why are you guys argueing? It's obvious that Russians are the best soldiers. We owned Hitla, Napoleon, Teutonic Crusaders, Poles, Mongols and Finno-Ugrics. I think thats enought to wear a title of the best soldiers. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
|
lol Man we were going to wipe you off the face of the earth, Katerinas vag must've been quite something. |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
|
Oh, okay. ---------- Post added 2010-09-13 at 07:20 ---------- What? Are you mad? I don't even know what is "Katerinas vag" what are you talking about? Go to wiki at least and see "Russian-Turkish wars" article. We won more wars with you than you with us. So sit tight. And you not even muslim.... Sorry? |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
|
Man don't you know Katerina who 'saved' Russia from the clutches of the Ottomans? May be you spelling smth write. What is Katerina? May be you mean Catherine II? The second worst ruler of Russia? Not our finest moment. But we won both wars with you : 1768—1774 and 1787—1792.
Sorry? Turks are muslims. And you are pagan tribalist. |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
|
May be you spelling smth write. What is Katerina? May be you mean Catherine II? The second worst ruler of Russia? Not our finest moment. But we won both wars with you : 1768—1774 and 1787—1792. Turks are muslims. And you are pagan tribalist. Turks are Turks, religion is an individual thing, I personally like to cherish the religion of my ancestors and not some Arab. Anyway, I'm not attacking you man I'm only joking. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 4 (0 members and 4 guests) | |
|