Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
I guess there's two levels to this question. How do the Han Chinese regard their country's own minorities, in particular the Uyghurs. Do the Han Chinese even regard Uyghurs as, as Chinese as them, or are they regarded as Central Asians who happen to reside in China? And also how do the Han Chinese regard external minorities, in particular blacks and middle easterns?
Although, I don't believe there is a substantial population of blacks in China as of yet, on my two week trip to Beijing last year of the whole time I saw one black family, who were American tourists and another who was a British tourist. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
Well,chinese don't recognise Uyghurs as a minority and opresses&assimilates them...It's hard to believe but Chinese even does nuclear tests in Eastern Turkestan |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
Btw the only two ethnic groups that have an independence movement are the Uyghurs and the Tibetans. All other 53 ethnic minoritys, such is the Zhuang which is the largest ethnic minority have preserve their cultural identity, language and traditions and are happy to be part of China. The only reason Uyghurs and Tibetans are able to develop an independence movement is because they have political organizations outside of the China and the United States invested heavily in these groups to achieve its own political aims. For example, back in the 60s the CIA gave weapons and money to the Dalai Lama in hopes of instigating an insurgency in Tibet and to undermine the Communists in China. America uses people like the Dalai Lama and Rebiya Kadeer as a political bargaining chips vs. China to help keep it in check. The US government could care less if the Uyghurs or Tibetans die or live, but they give these independcence groups money so that they could keep China as unstable as possible so as to slow down China progress into becoming a superpower that could challenge the US for resources and global leadership. Most Westerners screaming free Tibet or free Xinjiang don't understand the complexity of the situation and can't even locate those places on a map. The reality of the situation is very different from the pitch that you hear and read about on the news here in the West.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
Btw the only two ethnic groups that have an independence movement are the Uyghurs and the Tibetans. . |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
A lot of the reason the Uyghurs are like they are is simply because they're Muslims. Islam has a disproportionate amount of fanatic nut jobs who cause problems anywhere they happen to be. Muslims aren't happy unless they are in charge of everything or everyone is kissing their arse. ETIM training/recruitment video As you can see they are trying to indoctrinate children with fundamentalist Islam and training them to be terrorists. |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
Do you even understand the reality in China and the full history of Tibetans, Uyghurs and Mongols? Tibet's history is extremely complicated and anyone making the statement that Tibet was always free or Tibet has always been part of China is making a gross oversimplification. If we're going to talk about annexation and conquest, every country, every people on this planet was guilty of it at one point in their history. This is not a valid arguing point and people should go research this in depth before the say "give Tibet back to the Tibetans or Uyghurs have lived in E. Turkestan for thousands of years."
But lets focus on what Tibet really was like before the Chinese came in and occupied it. Tibet was a medieval feudal society where slavery was rampant. Tibetan leaders ruled with an iron fist while much of the population was in shackles. 95% of Tibetans had ZERO rights before 1950. People were sold and traded in the market freely and treated as animals. There was no education, medical care, sanitation and anything that benefited all of the people. Basically, the ruling class was the law of the land the leaders rule like an absolute Monarchy. This all changed when Chinese Communists came in and undertook land reforms which FOR THE FIRST TIME game the people their own land to farm and sheep to graze, while remaining ruling class fled to India, Europe and America taking with them a large portion of Tibets wealth. Tibetans now had free education, universal health-care, food, clothing and other basic essentials and can finally pursue the arts freely. Before the only true "Tibetan" arts were restricted to the upper class Monks who painted in the monasteries, but now every Tibetan is free to pursue their arts literature etc. etc. and Tibetan culture flourished and became popular in mainstream Chinese pop culture. Of course the Cultural Revolution was a dark period in modern Chinese history where millions died as a result but what do you think Tibet would have been if the Chinese didn't free them from slavery in the first place? Also do you even know what the Dalai Lama wants from the Chinese government? He never ever said he wants Tibetan Independence. What he actually wants is a more autonomous region and not a separate country. The Chinese government has been in constant dialogue with him and his camp in the past decades and he is welcome to return to China anytime he wants as long as he doesn't instigate any sort of separatism in Tibet. If there's anyone to blame for Tibet's problems its the aristocracy that took run off with Tibets wealth and now are screaming down with the Commies because they lost their previleged positions and exploitative way of life and American politicians who shamelessly misinform the masses for their own political objectives while not giving two shits about the Tibetan people. |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
Free Tibet, inner Mongolia and the Uyghur people and they can have their minorities in peace. It would be great to see a war in Asia to see who is the strongest, i bet for Japan (technology) and Mongolia (they already kicked chinese asses) |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
It is true, some Chinese territories belong to the Tibetans, the Indians, the Mongol and the Japanese. |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
It is true, some Chinese territories belong to the Tibetans, the Indians, the Mongol and the Japanese. A few Chinese nuclear weapons would wipe them off the face of the planet. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
It is true, some Chinese territories belong to the Tibetans, the Indians, the Mongol and the Japanese. |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
But going back to the topic, many western people, especially upper class people, scream "free Tibet" because that's what is "in" at the moment. Do you really thing Lindsay Lohan know what Tibetans are and what continent its on? Any support of the Dalai Lama should at least change their slogan from "free Tibet" to "Change Tibet from an Autonomous Region to a Special Administrative Region"
---------- Post added 2010-09-03 at 18:21 ---------- China is undoubtedly the power of East Asia, if not by sheer numbers then also by technology. The Japs have turned into pacifist pansies who would get trounced in a war these days. China isn't far off having it's own space station. |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
China is a piece of cake for India.
Back to the topic why China is so obsessed about Tibet, i would be better instead of wasting their money in a illegal occupation they invest their money in the poor han people of the countryside. ---------- Post added 2010-09-03 at 18:27 ---------- I have a hard time feeling sorry for uyghurs, mongols, kyrgyz and the other degenerate barbarians that live in western and northern china Im wondering why a Persian hates so much people living thousands of miles away. |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
China is a piece of cake for India. Reason enough? |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
You dont like mongols. right? 800 years ago they were breathing down our necks ---------- Post added 2010-09-03 at 23:22 ---------- They fucked up half of western Asia turning prosperous countryside into pasture for their stunted little ponies and wiped out great cities like Baghdad. Nishapur , Merv , Isfahan , Samarkand , Khiva , Herat , Balkh , Urgench All destroyed This is just a description of what happend in Nishapur: "In the year 1000CE, it was among the 10 largest cities on earth [2]. After the husband of Genghis Khan's daughter was killed at Nishapur in 1221, she ordered the death of all in the city (~1.7 million), and the skulls of men, women, and children were piled in pyramids by the Mongols" They are little barbarians who deserve no pity or mercy They fought like a bunch of pansies too ; they avoided head-on clashes and instead rode around shooting arrows like a bunch of schoolgirls |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
China is undoubtedly the power of East Asia, if not by sheer numbers then also by technology. The Japs have turned into pacifist pansies who would get trounced in a war these days. China isn't far off having it's own space station. |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
|