[Tazqoaap]

An instruction day to teach Zionists how to edit wikipedia. I love the first guy who says about teaching people how to edit wikipedia that it is to make "sure that it is balanced and Zionist in nature." So is it wrong for particular ethnic, religious, and political group to push forth their propaganda at wikipedia in a planned way? Wouldn't that lead to just a propaganda war, or a victory for the more efficient group, rather than the most accurate with the facts? Does wikipedia not completely suck when it comes to anything that allows for subjectivity?

[inhitoemits]

No. ...

[paydayus]

No. ...

Your answer makes me angry and hungry. Explain yourself.

[objennasweene]

You edited your post. First you had written "Should they...? I don't think they should

Why? Because of the same reasons you wrote then:

"Wouldn't that lead to just a propaganda war, or a victory for the more efficient group, rather than the most accurate with the facts?"

[Triiooman]

I was actually banned indefinitely on Wikipedia for writing "holohoax". The Jews rule Wikipedia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikiped...roject_Judaism

[uranbigis]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Boodlesthecat

^^ He's like a caricature stereotype of The Eternal Jew to the point it's not even funny. All that's on his mind is "anti-Semites", it's the only thing he can think of. Paranoid.

EliasAlucard vs. Boodles the Cat


...Now that's a pay-per-view cage match I'm willing to fork dough on.

[KkJvrG4d]

EliasAlucard vs. Boodles the Cat


...Now that's a pay-per-view cage match I'm willing to fork dough on.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_ta...esthecat#Elias

We've had our quarrels. He's like everything you can possibly hate with a passion in a human being. Whiny, totally subjective about his Jewish ethnicity, calls EVERYONE "anti-Semite" (even Jewish editors), wants every political and ethnic opponent banned (i.e., intolerance; not that different from some of the Finnish members who want their Russian and Swedish enemies banned on this forum ), and so on and so forth. Completely agenda-driven and only on Wikipedia to "defend" Judaism (not realising he's only creating more hatred against Jews by his disgusting behaviour).

What's funny is that shortly after he lobbied to get me banned for daring to write "holohoax", he got a one year ban himself because he's such a disruptive asshole.

Anyway, a good example of how Judaized Wikipedia is: you will get banned if you're a "Holocaust denier" but Anatolian pseudo-Turks are very welcome to deny the Armenian/Assyrian/Greek genocide. They say it's a neutrality balance to allow these hateful pseudo-Turks to fill Wikipedia with their bullshit agenda.

By the way, this reminds me, I need to get the ABF wiki functional again. I just need to fix some settings and shit, too busy with work at the moment.

[RafaelYV]

Anyway, a good example of how Judaized Wikipedia is: you will get banned if you're a "Holocaust denier" but Anatolian pseudo-Turks are very welcome to deny the Armenian/Assyrian/Greek genocide. They say it's a neutrality balance to allow these hateful pseudo-Turks to fill Wikipedia with their bullshit agenda.

Ah! That would explain why I got called a 'Holocaust denying racist' and banned for editing the 'Armenian Genocide' article.

[JosephEL]

(...)a good example of how Judaized Wikipedia is: you will get banned if you're a "Holocaust denier" but Anatolian pseudo-Turks are very welcome to deny the Armenian/Assyrian/Greek genocide. They say it's a neutrality balance to allow these hateful pseudo-Turks to fill Wikipedia with their bullshit agenda(...)

Of course! Everyone knows Jews have the monopoly of the historic suffering!

[QiuCIOdO]

Has anyone here ever tried to make a fallacious entry in Wikipedia articles? I've tried a few times with full intention to change it back just to see what would happen. Usually it's reverted within minutes. If you completely erase an article - the change is automatically reverted.

I guess you need to be a member who has made a lot of positive contributions before anyone could get away with this or something.

[EtellaObtaite]

An instruction day to teach Zionists how to edit wikipedia. I love the first guy who says about teaching people how to edit wikipedia that it is to make "sure that it is balanced and Zionist in nature." So is it wrong for particular ethnic, religious, and political group to push forth their propaganda at wikipedia in a planned way? Wouldn't that lead to just a propaganda war, or a victory for the more efficient group, rather than the most accurate with the facts? Does wikipedia not completely suck when it comes to anything that allows for subjectivity?

What's your obsession with Zionism about?

I'm an authentic Zionist, and i definitely never edited wiki, so wtf?

[JacksHH]

I was actually banned indefinitely on Wikipedia for writing "holohoax".

Why does that not suprise me? In any case if thats why, the ban sounds fair play i reckon. Lets say the two of us belong to the same ethnic group and that we lost a lot of relatives. (this part is true atleast) Now imagine some horrible minority of people within our group who barely make a proper fraction decide to rub our suffering in other peoples face. Do you think that means it is completely fair to make a mockery of genocidal attempts, when say there are many regular people like us hypothetically who do not exploit such a past or even bring it up in every day conversations with people? I am sure you understand very well.

[cxddfrxc]

Has anyone here ever tried to make a fallacious entry in Wikipedia articles? I've tried a few times with full intention to change it back just to see what would happen. Usually it's reverted within minutes. If you completely erase an article - the change is automatically reverted.

I guess you need to be a member who has made a lot of positive contributions before anyone could get away with this or something.

Like me.

But I take Wikipedia edits super seriously, so I would never.

[Niiinioa]

Even James Wenneker von Brunn was caught editing at Wikipedia:

Traces of Gunman’s Online Life Begin to Vanish
By NOAM COHEN
Updated | 6:27 p.m. A Google search for “James W. von Brunn,” the name of the 88-year-old white supremacist suspected of opening fire at the National Holocaust Museum in Washington, killing a security guard, reveals that he was apparently an active user of the Web — although traces of his work online are already being erased by some of the sites he frequented.

This cached page at a Web site called AskArt.com, shows what appears to be an example of Mr. von Brunn’s painting. As Gawker points out, the painting seems to be a sort of remix of a painting by Jean-Honoré Fragonard called The Reader and Pablo Picasso’s Woman With a Book. The artist’s page at AskArt also includes the first lines of a biography, which begins this way: “The von Brunn/Wenneker families migrated from Germany/Austria c. 1845, settling in St. Louis, Missouri.”

There were also traces of what appeared to be Mr. von Brunn’s work as a Wikipedia editor, albeit a very, very occasional one. More than a year before the shootings, the editor James von Brunn made a simple change to the article about Cordell Hull, the secretary of state during the Roosevelt administration. Next to a listing of Mr. Hull’s wife, Rose Frances Witz, he added the words “Orthodox Jew.” (Those words were removed long before the shootings.)
Just last month, he added a biography of himself — that he was born in 1920, and, among other things, “attempted to place the Federal Reserve Board of Governors under legal, non-violent citizens arrest, 12-7-81.”

While evidence of his editing of the Hull article remains, his biography has been expunged — and not expunged in the typical Wikipedia fashion, meaning that it can be found in the archives. The material for all intents and purposes has been destroyed. (The Times downloaded a copy of the biography before it disappeared.)

Jay Walsh, a spokesman for the Wikimedia Foundation in San Francisco which operates the many Wikipedia sites, said: “The editors have identified that the statements on his user page constituted a violation of policy of hate speech and moved quickly to protect and remove the information. It looks like the discussion page is blank, too — this is a pretty deep level of removal.”

He added that he had seen the biographical information on other sites, as well.

The blog Talking Points Memo has collected some Web postings and articles attributed to James W. von Brunn that could be found online earlier today. In a second post on the same blog, Zachary Roth adds that, “It looks like James Von Brunn tried to use Wikipedia to promote the work of Willis Carto, the right-wing Holocaust denier and founder of the Liberty Lobby.” http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/200...gin-to-vanish/

He even created a biography of himself there:

Current revision as of 19:14, 10 June 2009
User: James W. von Brunn, b.1920, attempted to place the Federal Resrve Board of Governors under legal, non-violent citizens arrest, 12-7-81. Von Brunn charged the FED with treason and other high crimes. The FED, a private stock-company, owned by International bankers, financed the construction of manufacturing plants in the Soviet Union during the "Cold War." War materials, produced by FED financed plants, were used by the Enemy against American military forces in Viet Nam, and elsewhere.

Von Brunn was tried and convicted by a Washington, D.C. kangaroo court; then sentenced to eleven years in federal prison by Judge Harriet Rosen Taylor; the sentence was confirmed by a racially motivated Appeals Court. Von Brunn was imprisoned for 6.5-years.

Von Brunn champions Western Culture,and the practice of Eugenics. He states that Marxism-Multiculturalism-Judaism is the Enemy of Mankind.citing Talmudic quotes to "Kill the Best Gentiles !"

Von Brunn was president of his college fraternity, SAE. He served as PT-Boat captain, USNR, during WW2, earning 4-battle stars and a Commendation Ribbon. His early business career was in NYC as copywriter, art-director and film producer; later as a real-estate broker; and lastly as a writer-artist.

Pls see attchment: FED CAPER.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:James_von_Brunn" http://graphics8.nytimes.com/package...nnuserpage.htm

[attanilifardy]

What's your obsession with Zionism about

What obsession? I made one thread about Zionism. If I made a critical thread about Furries does that mean I'm obsessed about Furries? Prior to becoming Papa Anodyne I was Anodyne and Cuddly Snuggly. Feel free to see how many threads I created about Zionism or times I posted in a thread dealing with Zionism critically. I don't think it would come out to more than one percent of my posts. That's hardly obsessive.

I'm an authentic Zionist,.. You didn't have to tell me you were an authentic Zionist. I could tell from your cheap tactic above. I'm not even anti-Zionist, in fact. I don't care what they do in the Middle East. As long as it doesn't involve the US.

...and i definitely never edited wiki, so wtf? I don't care what you do. You can masturbate to wikipedia for all I care. What I do care about is when a group of people come together with a political agenda to push forward by out editing the opposition. It's one thing if it's a guy doing so and another if it's a group of people training together to do so.

[kneexyFreedly]

The only problem I have encountered are the kurganists. But then again I don't read the political or WWII related articles.

[Coollabioto]

What obsession? I made one thread about Zionism.

Hell of a thread and its location moreover: Race and ethnicity in society.

WTF has Zionism got to do with all this?

You didn't have to tell me you were an authentic Zionist. I could tell from your cheap tactic above.

sigged.

I don't care what you do. You can masturbate to wikipedia for all I care. What I do care about is when a group of people come together with a political agenda to push forward by out editing the opposition. It's one thing if it's a guy doing so and another if it's a group of people training together to do so.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irony

The only problem I have encountered are the kurganists.

Yes, those are a pain in the ***... Without even mentionning the IE palaeolithic continuity addicts

[Nmoitmzr]

Hell of a thread and its location moreover: Race and ethnicity in society.

WTF has Zionism got to do with all this? You ever google the definition of Zionism?

# a policy for establishing and developing a national homeland for Jews in Palestine
# a movement of world Jewry that arose late in the 19th century with the aim of creating a Jewish state in Palestine Appears pretty ethnic oriented, no?

Listen, you said something stupid accusing me of being obsessed with Zionism. Instead of being a man and saying you fucked up and moving on you had to embarrass yourself further.

sigged. Or you can tattoo it.

Your attitude proves the opposite. My attitude towards Zionism is clear, you little emotional wreck. I don't care what they do in the Middle East as long as they leave the US out of it. But I also like something called fairness and see it's wrong for a group to come together for no other purpose but to promote their view over others simply because they're more efficent at editing out people's work.

Too rare to be true. Are you stupid? You must be. Most people who aren't Arab, Fundemental Christians, or Jewish don't give a shit about that region of the world unless they have something at stake (same with other regions). It's too rare for someone not to give a shit about something that doesn't involve their ethnic group, family, or friends? Most Americans may care about what goes on in Iraq but what the fuck do they care what Israelis do as long as it doesn't involve Americans.



That's just as cheap Accusing someone who posted a negative thread about Zionists of being obsessive about the subject is an attempt make me appear like some internet forum anti-Semite. Unfortunately for you I rarely discuss Zionism or even Jews and so you lack proof. Slander is a cheap tactic and one I noticed hyper senstive Zionists like yourself tend to play.

"I dont care about what you do at home, as long as it doesn't involve Israel."

Sounds pathetic already. WTF? I didn't say that, you little bitch. I don't even know the purpose of it. What is pathetic is rewriting my post. What benefit did you get from that other than looking shameful. That's another cheap trick.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irony What, exactly, is ironic about what is in bold? I know the term irony is a difficult concept for you but try to explain how it applies. Afterwards, I, someone who understands the term and can apply it correctly, will let you know if you misused the word or not.

Is my thread a consequences of me and others putting our minds together to push forth propaganda, you fucking idiot? Do I represent a group? Did I and members of this fictional group come together and decided we're going to spam obscure race forums to make Zionists look bad? Did I go to some idiotic meeting to teach me how to post in obscure forums to make Zionism look bad? You fucking, dishonest retard.

You have offered nothing in your response except to look like the fanatic that you are. This video is small time and you got your pathetic self worked up about it. I can't imagine how you'd act when something serious about Israel or Zionism is posted. I'm sure it'll be honest and objective as you have already shown yourself to be.

[CVEGK7mV]

You ever google the definition of Zionism?

I dont need Google to teach me about Zionism.

Appears pretty ethnic oriented, no? Depends, Poale Tzion (and its son, 3avodah) isn't ethnic oriented.... But I doubt you heard about it.

Listen, you said something stupid accusing me of being obsessed with Zionism. I actually wasn't reffering specifically to you, but now; I'm eager to do so.

Instead of being a man and saying you fucked up and moving on you had to embarrass yourself further. Apology is not my definition of Manhood.

Or you can tattoo it. Tattoos bring Karet b'7ilul HaShem.

My attitude towards Zionism is clear, you little emotional wreck. Just keep in mind that I am anything but emotive, proceed....

I don't care what they do in the Middle East as long as they leave the US out of it. So, in definitive; you do care about Zionism.

But I also like something called fairness and see it's wrong for a group to come together for no other purpose but to promote their view over others simply because they're more efficent at editing out people's work. Then you've mixed up Jews and Zionists, fairly unsurprizing.

Are you stupid? You must be. Perhaps, I rarely got the right to this label though.

Most people who aren't Arab, Fundemental Christians, or Jewish don't give a shit about that region of the world unless they have something at stake (same with other regions). So... You're implying that Bahais and Druzim "don't give a shit about that region of the world"?
Interesting theory...

It's too rare for someone not to give a shit about something that doesn't involve their ethnic group, family, or friends? Yes, I'm afraid it is; if you don't believe me... I'm ready to bet 1 million € about the aura and attention Israel's gonna draw on itself the next time something happens in the region.

Most Americans may care about what goes on in Iraq but what the fuck do they care what Israelis do as long as it doesn't involve Americans.
Because Americans have troops stationned in Israel.


Accusing someone who posted a negative thread about Zionists of being obsessive about the subject is an attempt make me appear like some internet forum anti-Semite. I wasn't adressing you in particular, but if you want to head in this direction, you're more than encouraged

None the less, where did I state that you were anti-semitic?

Unfortunately for you I rarely discuss Zionism or even Jews and so you lack proof. Slander is a cheap tactic and one I noticed hyper senstive Zionists like yourself tend to play.
"Bla bla bla, you don't interest me so you can't get me on this point...BTW, I noticed how you folks do this and that in the context of a global tactic, etc..."

Don't you ever get bored with such ridiculous statements?
None the less, here's something I fairly don't understand:

If you have no interest in Jooooo$ or Zioni$t$, then how the hell could "notice" their "cheap tactic"?

Doesn't make a lot of sense imo


WTF? I didn't say that, you little bitch. Why swear? If anything, wouldn't you be "hyper sensitive"?

I don't even know the purpose of it. What is pathetic is rewriting my post. I'll grant you that, I love reshaping your posts, why make it complicated when you can make it simple?

What benefit did you get from that other than looking shameful. That's another cheap trick. Benefit? lol, I'm not on this trench either, not yet that is.

What, exactly, is ironic about what is in bold? No way, you won't make me believe that you don't read your own threads

Is my thread a consequences of me and others putting our minds together to push forth propaganda, you fucking idiot? Do I represent a group? Yes, you're a "post-modern communist"

Did I and members of this fictional group come together and decided we're going to spam obscure race forums to make Zionists look bad? Dunno, I have no access to your PMs and your head isn't made of glass

Did I go to some idiotic meeting to teach me how to post in obscure forums to make Zionism look bad? You fucking, dishonest retard. Who knows? You never know how people are in real life...

You have offered nothing in your response except to look like the fanatic that you are. Fanatic? Even though most of my friends are Palestinian, I still get the right to the "fanatic" label.... Classy

I can't imagine how you'd act when something serious about Israel or Zionism is posted. Good point, I usually don't react; because I know what I'll get in return.

I'm sure it'll be honest and objective as you have already shown yourself to be. Well, of course I am, it would be hard to prove the opposite I assure you.

[Toninvell]

Are you stupid? You must be. Most people who aren't Arab, Fundemental Christians, or Jewish don't give a shit about that region of the world unless they have something at stake (same with other regions).

If that is true, it must be changed. Anyway, here I have met many people who are not fundamentalists and they have nothing to do with that region butsupport the liberation of Palestine.

It's too rare for someone not to give a shit about something that doesn't involve their ethnic group, family, or friends? Most Americans may care about what goes on in Iraq but what the fuck do they care what Israelis do as long as it doesn't involve Americans.

Yes it is! If somebody told you "there was a massacre in a Japanese school where 200 people died"...Wouldn't you be sad? I would, and I think a lot of people would be too, although it doesn't involve their ethnic group, family or friends...

By the way, "Americans may care about what goes on in Iraq but what the fuck do they care what Israelis do as long as it doesn't involve Americans" I don't know if that would be true if it didn't involved America, but it does.