More media bias:
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...kland-raiders/

Obviously. The fact that they haven't done anything in years should say a lot to the potential seen in this team. #1 all the way.

That was funny right. I like how he blamed it on a Media Bias against the silver and black.

The countdown was the top 100 players as voted by the players.

If nothing else, it says a lot to the potential seen in this athlete.

clearly justblogbaby screwed the pooch and was too unkind to the raiders .

The NFL Top 100 List messed up!
 

Not enough Raiders!

http://justblogbaby.com/2012/07/11/r...ayers-of-2012/

If they are on the raiders, they are good enough for the top 100 - they should have 53 spots. Maybe a couple from their practice squad too, so lets go with 55 spots.

Part of the media bias right there.

Ponder has yet to be in a super bowl, break any NFL records, or win a playoff game either. SWEET, the vikings have a top five NFL player at the QB position

So the average team would have roughly three players in the top 100, but the Raiders deserve seven or eight. Got it.

5: Darren McFadden – Due to his injury issues I just didn’t feel right placing Mcfadden lower than 5. The fact is this player has yet to be in a super bowl, break any NFL records, or win a playoff game. That should say a lot to the potential seen in this athlete.

Dude is right. Based on this infallible logic, Beanie Wells should be ranked in the top 10 as well.

And their opinions are obviously skewed because they're inundated with anti-Raider propaganda year-in and year-out in the media.

At least 8. Palmer and the wide receivers just missed. But they probably are worthy now due to McFadden.

Of course they should, if it weren't for that Media Bias

I was going to post that very thing in the comments, but didn't want to register for whatever blog site he uses.

He missed the entire back seven. Aaron Curry was a number 4 overall pick who has accomplished nothing in this league so far.
That should say a lot to the potential seen in him.