DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate (http://www.discussworldissues.com/forums/index.php)
-   Asia (http://www.discussworldissues.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=15)
-   -   why many researchers use proto-dravidian instead of tamil (http://www.discussworldissues.com/forums/showthread.php?t=129162)

MannoFr 11-01-2005 07:00 AM

Quote:

1. The sanskrit is not a language created by the god, the sanskrit is not at all a language.

2. if it is a language ,why the sanskrit is not spoken by many of the brahmins.In tamilnadu,most of the brahmins speak tamil.
Vanakkam Thamizh

Can u brief me on the connection between the first line and the second line !

Drugmachine 11-24-2005 07:00 AM

Ok Badri, sorry.

It's why i asked to stop this discussion here. http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...n_rolleyes.gif

softy54534 03-09-2006 07:00 AM

Quote:

Hello everybody,

I just want to share with you what I know about Sanskrit. Please correct me, if I am not right.

Sanskrit is not a language spoken by anybody, but it is developed by Odhuvar or priests for praising God, and pronouncing Mandhirangal(Manthras) two millennium ago. Odhuvar were those who involved only in conducting Sacred rituals in Daily Poosai(Pooja) and pronouncing Mandhirangal(Manthras).

Only Odhuvar knew Sanskrit and they used only in Temple for pronouncing Mandhirangal (Manthras). In day to day life, Odhuvar spoke tamizh.

After some period, Odhuvar claimed that Sanskrit was Language of God.

Odhuvar became Brahmin, who are still conducting rituals in temple and pronouncing Mandhirangal (Manthras).

New information - Few days back, Kalaingar announced that anybody can become Archagar(priest). I appreciate his move. on this. I also read that Brahmins opposed this.


We also must bear in mind that most writers and poets in Sanskrit apaarently were not Brahmanas. Vethavyasan (Mahabharatha) was of ftraditionally fisherman profression. Vaalmiki was an Athivasi.(hunter).
Researchers say many of the veda composers were also not BrahmaNa.
The connection between Br and Sans is that Sanskirt is their "working" language when they perform the priestly job. Even Kamban who translated Ramayana from Sans to Tamiz was no BrahmaNa.

People of other religions such as Jains and Bhuddists had/have also used Sanskrit (or some related language)

It is just a language there for anybody who wants to use it.

Beerinkol 05-29-2006 04:20 PM

why many researchers use proto-dravidian instead of tamil
 
why many researchers use proto-dravidian instead of tamil. Because they know tamil is the oldest language, so they use the word proto-dravidian and tell that all the four southern indian language are derived from that. But the truth is tamil is the root language of all other south indian languages.The proto-dravidian is nothing but tamil. Also they tell malayalam is derived from proto tamil-malayalam(The point i strongly oppose).I think malayalam is formed by mixing the sanskrit with tamil. I tell tamil is the oldest language in the world. The sanskrit is not a language created by the god, the sanskrit is not at all a language. if it is a language ,why the sanskrit is not spoken by many of the brahmins.In tamilnadu,most of the brahmins speak tamil.

HedgeYourBets 05-31-2006 01:22 AM

Quote:

............why the sanskrit is not spoken by many of the brahmins.In tamilnadu,most of the brahmins speak tamil.
what is connection between Brahmanas and Samskrutham..pls explain

Slonopotam845 05-31-2006 02:23 AM

Quote:

http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...quote_icon.png Originally Posted by maduraithamizhmanikandan ............why the sanskrit is not spoken by many of the brahmins.In tamilnadu,most of the brahmins speak tamil.
what is connection between Brahmanas and Samskrutham..pls explain Wow! srivatsan, I think this is the best question so far asked in this forum by anyone. You should be commended for it!! I would await the answer!

S.T.D. 05-31-2006 03:08 AM

Quote:

http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...quote_icon.png Originally Posted by srivatsan http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...quote_icon.png Originally Posted by maduraithamizhmanikandan ............why the sanskrit is not spoken by many of the brahmins.In tamilnadu,most of the brahmins speak tamil.
what is connection between Brahmanas and Samskrutham..pls explain Wow! srivatsan, I think this is the best question so far asked in this forum by anyone. You should be commended for it!! I would await the answer! Ms. Sivamala,

I dont know whether you are Sircastic or not but I mean it...What is the very connection between Brahmanas and Samskrutham? As a language it is NOT a property of one sect........ http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...icon_smile.gif

softy54534 05-31-2006 03:37 AM

Quote:

Ms. Sivamala,

I dont know whether you are Sircastic or not but I mean it...What is the very connection between Brahmanas and Samskrutham? As a language it is NOT a property of one sect........ Smile
No, I really mean to compliment you!! Keep it up.

Peptobismol 06-01-2006 12:59 AM

hm yaarachum therincha answer pannungalen. iam waiting!

Beerinkol 06-01-2006 02:03 AM

Quote:

hm yaarachum therincha answer pannungalen. iam waiting!
http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...lies/ymlol.gif http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...lies/ymlol.gif http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...lies/ymlol.gif Crazy....i like your post!

TorryJens 06-01-2006 02:08 AM

Quote:

http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...quote_icon.png Originally Posted by crazy hm yaarachum therincha answer pannungalen. iam waiting!
http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...lies/ymlol.gif http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...lies/ymlol.gif http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...lies/ymlol.gif Crazy....i like your post! iam extremely sorry, did i say anything wrong?
iam just curious, being tamil and living in a country far way from india and eelam i only know a very little of tamil!

and sorry again, i didnt mean anything! http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...n_rolleyes.gif i just wanted someone to answer!

Big A 06-01-2006 06:39 AM

Quote:

http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...quote_icon.png Originally Posted by srivatsan http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...quote_icon.png Originally Posted by crazy hm yaarachum therincha answer pannungalen. iam waiting!
http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...lies/ymlol.gif http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...lies/ymlol.gif http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...lies/ymlol.gif Crazy....i like your post! iam extremely sorry, did i say anything wrong?
iam just curious, being tamil and living in a country far way from india and eelam i only know a very little of tamil!

and sorry again, i didnt mean anything! http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...n_rolleyes.gif i just wanted someone to answer! hey no..no..it was very funny, I remembered a Vivek's dialogue!

9mm_fan 06-09-2006 01:39 AM

Hello everybody,

I just want to share with you what I know about Sanskrit. Please correct me, if I am not right.

Sanskrit is not a language spoken by anybody, but it is developed by Odhuvar or priests for praising God, and pronouncing Mandhirangal(Manthras) two millennium ago. Odhuvar were those who involved only in conducting Sacred rituals in Daily Poosai(Pooja) and pronouncing Mandhirangal(Manthras).

Only Odhuvar knew Sanskrit and they used only in Temple for pronouncing Mandhirangal (Manthras). In day to day life, Odhuvar spoke tamizh.

After some period, Odhuvar claimed that Sanskrit was Language of God.

Odhuvar became Brahmin, who are still conducting rituals in temple and pronouncing Mandhirangal (Manthras).

New information - Few days back, Kalaingar announced that anybody can become Archagar(priest). I appreciate his move. on this. I also read that Brahmins opposed this.

brraverishhh 06-09-2006 07:05 PM

Tamizhs are everywhere in the world. But there is no country for Tamizhs http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...s/thumbsup.gif

Raj_Copi_Jin 06-09-2006 11:06 PM

Crazy,

Tamil 'Nadu' is really a hypocrisy..
Nadu means country.. But it is an indian state !
Tamil Nadu will be very developped if it was not an indian state !
TN contribuate to develop the other states !

If GOSL and SLA continue this daily killing of Tamil people in NE of Sri lanka, Eelam will be the first modern tamil country..

(www.tamilnet.com to follow this slow genocide, by example http://www.tamilnet.com/art.html?catid=13&artid=18447)

Lt_Apple 06-09-2006 11:10 PM

Quote:

Crazy,

Tamil 'Nadu' is really a hypocrisy..
Nadu means country.. But it is an indian state
!

If GOSL and SLA continue this daily killing of Tamil people in NE of Sri lanka, Eelam will be the first and modern tamil country..

(www.tamilnet.com to follow this slow genocide)
i know that!

God bless us, it will be the very first tamil country! http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...icon_smile.gif
iam waiting for that wonderful day!

PhillipHer 06-09-2006 11:15 PM

Yes Crazy God bless us . http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...on_biggrin.gif

9mm_fan 06-09-2006 11:21 PM

http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...icon_smile.gif

PhillipHer 06-10-2006 08:47 AM

Quote:

Tamil 'Nadu' is really a hypocrisy..
Nadu means country.. But it is an indian state !
Adeyappa! "Nadu" does not have to mean independent country. It can also simply mean "idam", or even "ulakam". For us Indian Tamils, Tamil Nadu *is* our thaaynaadu in a very deep way. Fortunately, we do not have to choose between our Tamil thaay and India. There is no contradiction in our naadu being a part of India, because it still belongs to us.

Quote:

Tamil Nadu will be very developped if it was not an indian state !
TN contribuate to develop the other states !
We contribute much more than even most Tamils realise. But think how many thousands of our youth would have died if we had had to fight India. After the events of the 1960s (and particularly the DMK's election gains in 1962), India has treated us with respect and honour. What would we have gained through the fight? Money is not worth so much.

But it is a funny thing. In the early 1950s Tamils in Tamil Nadu wanted to break away from India. This was considered one of the biggest threats to Indian unity then. In Sri Lanka at that time, Jaffna Tamils thought Chelvanayagam was being unnecessarily quarrelsome when he asked even for federalism. As it turned out, we in Tamil Nadu received more concessions from India than we had thought we would (even today, TN is the only state to which the Official Languages Order does not apply). It was exactly the opposite for you in Sri Lanka. At that time, I don't think anyone would have thought that it would end up like this.

Seri pa, enough seriousness from me.

brraverishhh 06-10-2006 11:05 PM

Thanks podalangai for your reaction.

For me Nadu does mean country and not a 'idam' or place.
By chance Tamil's struggle in Sri lanka helped Tamils in India to get the respect of India, unfortunately it is still not the case for us..

Now Tamils of India must help Sri lankan tamil to obtain a federal system or a separate state if federalism is not possible with this chauvinist govt.

TN is the richest state i think. It is a state which produce richness.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:58 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2