DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate (http://www.discussworldissues.com/forums/index.php)
-   Asia (http://www.discussworldissues.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=15)
-   -   a new history?! (http://www.discussworldissues.com/forums/showthread.php?t=129404)

softy54534 03-10-2006 07:00 AM

An Indian who visited Indonesia/Malaysia region saw them making a kueh (or "cake") which looks like "idli".
The kueh is called "puttu piring" . Made of rice flour, coconut flakes and gula melaka (the equivalent of vellam or karuppatti).
With no further evidence, he jumped to the conclusion that idli came from Indon!!
An Indian is someone who believes everything came from outside.

PS. The Chinese have more varieties of steamed cakes. One of them is very close to idli, except that it is made of pure rice flour and eaten with cooked bamboo shoots and chilli sambal. Name: chwee kueh. (means water-cake)

LottiFurmann 04-07-2006 07:00 AM

is it the book The Age of Kali by William Dalrymple ?

Slonopotam845 05-09-2006 07:00 AM

Quote:

i cant just understand these people who r feeling proud of someones culture(special someone who came all the way cross the world)......................just coz u converted into another religion does it make u a foreigner??????????????????can it change ur identity??????????
Lets not get carried away here. Portugal ruled Goa for more than 400 yrs and they integrated well with the locals and so did their culture. If we are proud of Taj Mahal (it was built by a great grandson of an Afghanistan native) in an alien style (at that point of time in history) why not be proud of Portuguese culture, which is a part of the present Goanese culture.

Many of us sadly want to interpret our past culture and history what we want them to be. I think we should accept it as it was. If our ancestors did not wear blouse.....so be it. Why loose sleep over it. They should have done it for a reason. Just because today’s morals and styles are different doesn't mean that their style was wrong or anything.

One of the reasons why our culture and civilization hasn’t died is because we are a open culture and incorporate changes as and when they occur. Trying to close ourselves will have a negative impact.

Slonopotam845 05-16-2006 12:33 AM

a new history?!
 
Hi everyone,
i recently read a book called "The age of kali". In that book the author had referred in a page as ".....................in bangalore like every where else in south india, women went topless until the Britons in 19th century encouraged them to cover themself up".

I was shocked. I have never heard that before!
Is that true or is this is just a made up (hi)story????????

NeroASERCH 05-16-2006 12:39 AM

Quote:

is it the book The Age of Kali by William Dalrymple ?
exactly! have u read?

Lillie_Steins 05-16-2006 04:05 AM

It should be intox..

We learn to Britishes to take daily shower, so i don't think they teached Indians to wear !! http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...n_rolleyes.gif

Ifroham4 05-16-2006 03:01 PM

I dont know about Bangalore, but in many communities in Kerala Men/Women where topless (shirtless).

Raj_Copi_Jin 05-16-2006 07:29 PM

Two generations back in South TamilNadu women did not wear blouse, only sari.
The British sure did bring with them their style of dressing from neck to toes for women. As Men adapted to the British style of wearing clothes (shirts and trousers), women also followed suit by wearing blouses.
The paintings and sculptures in our temples speak for themselves.

PhillipHer 05-16-2006 07:33 PM

Top less here may not be meaning wearing nothn on the top ...

I guess dsath's words make sense !

LottiFurmann 05-16-2006 11:07 PM

whatever he should have written a bit precis!

another one: he was asking a woman in GOA about how goa got independence? and how she felt when Goa came under india? that woman was talking as if she is from portugual and portuguese took better care of goa and the people and blah blah blah.........................i can never understand such people?
do anyone of u understand her?

PhillipHer 05-17-2006 03:12 AM

Quote:

whatever he should have written a bit precis!

another one: he was asking a woman in GOA about how goa got independence? and how she felt when Goa came under india? that woman was talking as if she is from portugual and portuguese took better care of goa and the people and blah blah blah.........................i can never understand such people?
do anyone of u understand her?
Hmm....nope, I jus dont! http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...n_confused.gif http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...n_rolleyes.gif http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...milies/huh.gif

tgs 05-17-2006 05:11 AM

lamby
she was so proud of her portuguese culture http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...n_rolleyes.gif , what was she thinking? she was talking as if goa was located on portugual, and india took over it and etc etc. what nonsense! it was portuguese who took over Goa from india, i never heard that people in goa was one of a kind.....................aint thay indians too!
i cant just understand these people who r feeling proud of someones culture(special someone who came all the way cross the world)......................just coz u converted into another religion does it make u a foreigner??????????????????can it change ur identity??????????

when i read those pages, i got so mad that i wanted to slap that woman! but i cant and thats not fair either!

MannoFr 05-17-2006 07:02 PM

crazy,

The author would have interviewed hundreds of people and would have selectively included those that suits his agenda. not something we dont see in media.

do anyone of u understand her? Well did you understand when our dear PM gave a speach in Oxford and said that "British rule in India was Good governence" and that India's independence stuggle was for "Self governance" rather than rejection of "British claim to good governance".

Didn't the lady also say the samething.

Slonopotam845 05-17-2006 07:38 PM

Beautifully said, dsath!

Quote:

i cant just understand these people who r feeling proud of someones culture
Crazy, you have to understand the context and the background of this woman. She could well be of a Portugese descent, traching her ancestry back to the settlers. In which case, that is her own culture, not someone elses and she has every right to be proud of it!

tgs 05-18-2006 04:59 AM

If we are proud of Taj Mahal (it was built by a great grandson of an Afghanistan native) in an alien style (at that point of time in history Hum Hum... http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...n_rolleyes.gif

Is it really an alien style ? Mughol style born in India in the contact of Arabs and Indian architecture...
After this style expanded in whole Arabia...

NeroASERCH 05-18-2006 07:25 PM

Quote:

If we are proud of Taj Mahal (it was built by a great grandson of an Afghanistan native) in an alien style (at that point of time in history) why not be proud of Portuguese culture, which is a part of the present Goanese culture.
i thought shah jahan was born to a rajput woman, just like the previuos mughal kings! http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...n_rolleyes.gif
but anyway just coz someone ruled us for some centuries, does it mean that we got to converted or get immensed into their culture and history! i cant just imagine india as a mughal country cos they ruled it for a while or as brithish country just coz they ruled it for 3-400 years!
r we suppossed to change our identity and get pruod of our once "ruler"?

softy54534 05-18-2006 08:06 PM

Quote:

r we supposed to change our identity and get proud of our once "ruler"?
No crazy, its not changing, its integrating. Take the tamil catholic Christians for example. They get married the Christian way but still wear a chain similar to Thali worn by their Hindu counterparts. The pendant has a leaf and mother Mary(i think) on it instead of the traditional Hindu Gods. Now thats called integration.

On the lighter side, what do you think of Briyani. Its a recipe brought by invaders. Haven't we adapted it to our palate. I have read somewhere that even idli is not a native - native of Tamilnadu. We have adopted and adapted to outside influence rather than build a wall. Just imagine what we would have missed hadn't we welcomed the outside influence. Our very OWN precious idlis!!!!! http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...icon_smile.gif Outside Tamilnadu anywhere in India 'Madrasi' is identified with idli and shambar.
The same yardstick can be applied for our culture also.

Peptobismol 05-18-2006 08:10 PM

yeah u r right! anyway i found the book so irritating, i read it only coz it was about india!

Lillie_Steins 05-18-2006 11:57 PM

Quote:

i thought shah jahan was born to a rajput woman, just like the previuos mughal kings! http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...n_rolleyes.gif
Um...no, tat was Jehangir, SJ's father & Akbar's son.....born to Akbar's Rajput wife Jodhabai.....afa I know, he was the only mughal born to a rajput/hindu woman....

Slonopotam845 05-19-2006 12:24 AM

Quote:

If our ancestors did not wear blouse.....so be it. Why loose sleep over it. They should have done it for a reason. Just because today’s morals and styles are different doesn't mean that their style was wrong or anything.
Actually the reason was tat in Hinduism originally stitched or tailored cloth (in this case blouses) wer not allowed as they wer considered "impure"...esp. in temple premises....even men wore unstitched cloth back then.....
But all the same, we cudnt see ne reason for the same 'trend' to be re-introduced for the same reason in today's society! (of course its a diff. issue tat today's fashion trendmakers r keen on the same atleast in case of women, albeit for a different reason!).....
One of the reasons why our culture and civilization hasn’t died is because we are a open culture and incorporate changes as and when they occur. Trying to close ourselves will have a negative impact. Wat u say is true no doubt.....but unftly the present gen. (I dont mean youth only) seems to be taking undue advantage of the fact tat we r an open culture by opening up to even changes tat r unwarranted for! This'd hav to be realised by them for the situation to improve......!


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2