LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 09-21-2012, 07:14 PM   #21
aaafluochugh

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
473
Senior Member
Default
He hits the open market in 2014, pending an extension.
He has to be a RFA next year right? 4 years for rooks? Unless he signs the 1-year qualifying offer from the Bucks next year....which a player would be stupid to do. VERY risky.
aaafluochugh is offline


Old 09-21-2012, 07:14 PM   #22
aaafluochugh

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
473
Senior Member
Default
Why is that so impossible? Do you realize how many different things could happen to make that possible?
Have you watched Bucks? Or the Bulls and Heat?

Every. Single. One. of those things would have to happen for an entire series. Don't be ridiculous.
aaafluochugh is offline


Old 09-21-2012, 08:24 PM   #23
Peabelilt

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
408
Senior Member
Default
Jenninngs is talented player that takes a lot of bad shots.


I guess he could get better, but the the Bucks should trade him while they can.
Peabelilt is offline


Old 09-21-2012, 08:51 PM   #24
LongaDonga

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
753
Senior Member
Default Yeah, Nothing is wrong here.
I know what he tweeted after but for him to say he's "looking into big market teams" is concerning. Same old same old I guess.

Jennings told Broussard, "I'm going to keep my options open, knowing that the time is coming up. I'm doing my homework on big-market teams."

http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/sports/139097574.html
LongaDonga is offline


Old 09-21-2012, 09:00 PM   #25
cepAceryTem

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
517
Senior Member
Default
The Bucks aren't developing anyone. All of their playing time is going to Jennings, and then a bunch of middling journeymen in an effort to snare the 8th seed and get a first round exit again. That's the big goal here.
Are you saying its impossible for an 8th seed to win a Playoff series?
cepAceryTem is offline


Old 09-21-2012, 09:34 PM   #26
Ehlgamxf

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
436
Senior Member
Default
are the bucks willing to give him a max deal?
No, but I'l go something like 5/50.
Ehlgamxf is offline


Old 09-21-2012, 10:22 PM   #27
aaafluochugh

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
473
Senior Member
Default
are the bucks willing to give him a max deal?
They would have to be mental to even think about it.
aaafluochugh is offline


Old 09-22-2012, 12:37 AM   #28
cepAceryTem

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
517
Senior Member
Default
He's shoot-first PG who is a career 39% FG shooter. Max money for him would be ABSURD.
If youre only looking at #s and %s, youre right.
cepAceryTem is offline


Old 09-22-2012, 01:40 AM   #29
cepAceryTem

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
517
Senior Member
Default
Just because a team would be much worse without you doesn't mean you should be a max player. Those are the kind of deals that got the league in so much trouble over the last decade.

I think whoever said 5/50...that seems much more appropriate.
Huh? If the team sinks without him, doesnt that kind of make him invaluable to them?
cepAceryTem is offline


Old 09-22-2012, 01:57 AM   #30
rengerts

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
493
Senior Member
Default
Brandon, Philadelphia meets your criteria. Thank you.
rengerts is offline


Old 09-22-2012, 01:57 AM   #31
replicaypu

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
432
Senior Member
Default
Pretty sure he's open market next year, hence the article in him looking at big markets.
He hits the open market in 2014, pending an extension.
replicaypu is offline


Old 09-22-2012, 02:01 AM   #32
LongaDonga

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
753
Senior Member
Default
He's shoot-first PG who is a career 39% FG shooter. Max money for him would be ABSURD.
The Bucks are shit without him, last year proved that. He's gotten better and better.
LongaDonga is offline


Old 09-22-2012, 02:13 AM   #33
replicaypu

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
432
Senior Member
Default
As to the original thing, dude is one of the few people to say he genuinely likes Milwaukee(the city) and doesn't believe stars will avoid playing there if they win.
replicaypu is offline


Old 09-22-2012, 02:19 AM   #34
cepAceryTem

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
517
Senior Member
Default
Are you saying the Bucks, as #8, could beat the Heat or the Bulls in a series?
Why is that so impossible? Do you realize how many different things could happen to make that possible?
cepAceryTem is offline


Old 09-22-2012, 03:01 AM   #35
aaafluochugh

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
473
Senior Member
Default
Are you saying its impossible for an 8th seed to win a Playoff series?
Are you saying the Bucks, as #8, could beat the Heat or the Bulls in a series?
aaafluochugh is offline


Old 09-22-2012, 06:12 AM   #36
snislarne

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
460
Senior Member
Default
Huh? If the team sinks without him, doesnt that kind of make him invaluable to them?
No. The goal is to win a championship. Giving him a max contract could quite possibly hinder that goal, even if they stink by letting him go.
snislarne is offline


Old 09-22-2012, 07:11 AM   #37
sttrqiss

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
435
Senior Member
Default
Its not like Jennings is as bad of sign as Redd. If the Bucks lose Jennings the franchise is completely sunk. It just sucks that a franchise like the Bucks really can't even compete for the NBA Finals. Making the playoffs is the best a Bucks fan can hope for.
sttrqiss is offline


Old 09-22-2012, 07:12 AM   #38
Byxtysaaqwuz

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
481
Senior Member
Default
are the bucks willing to give him a max deal?
Byxtysaaqwuz is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 4 (0 members and 4 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:12 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity