Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
Just wondering if there are enough active people to participate in a little "debate game." In Australia, it's called Mass Debate.
Mass Debating is a common activity in Australian schools. For it to be qualified as a Mass Debate, 11 or more people must be involved and a certain criteria for the rules must be met. The debate is not done as formally as other debating styles, rather it involves two teams of five members each debating freely without the constrains of a turn based system. A Mass Debate usually starts with the eleventh person, designated as the "Mass Debater" giving the two teams their topic. The two teams then argue that topic freely. ... . The debate continues until the "Mass Debater" calls out [finale], after which the two teams must sum up their arguments and sway the "Mass Debater" who will then decide on the winner. Players will sign up and randomly be assigned to the PRO or CON side of the topic. If you are assigned to that side, you must argue that side! This means Devil's Advocacy WILL happen. Hence, the name of the game! I believe this sort of game will promote healthy debate and improve debating skill. Even -actually, especially!- if you argue against what you believe, you will learn how to provide a convincing argument for any side while opening your eyes to the opponent's view point. If this is alright with the mods, I'd like to take sign ups. If there aren't enough people on one team, someone may be cut to reduce the number of players to make the teams even. If someone is cut, they will have priority for the next game. I will be taking sign-ups for 1 week or until the roster is full. If you miss this game, please post so you can get priority for the next game.
Thanks for checking this out! |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
Geez, when I was the debating champion of NSW many, many moons ago, debating teams consisted of only 3 per side and the 'Devil's Advocate' rule was par for the course.
*we often said we disagreed with a topic we actually agreed with to be put on the affirmative team* LMAO Anyway.....yes, I will do this. Sounds like fun. |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
I am just not interested in calling it Mass Debate or calling myself the Mass Debater. :|
This isn't formal debating, but if we get popular maybe we can get a nice little team thing going. The problem with formal, small teams is if they aren't on during the same time zone the team fails with lack of discussion. X |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
I am just not interested in calling it Mass Debate or calling myself the Mass Debater. :| Oh well, I'll just crawl back into my own corner of Oz and find a stray kangaroo to pet.. Good luck with it. |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|